R. K. AGRAWAL, S. P. MEHROTRA, C. K. PRASAD
GAURAV TRIPATHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble S.P. Mehrotra, J.—A Division Bench consisting of two of us (R.K. Agrawal, J. and S.P. Mehrotra, J.) while dealing with Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 3326 of 2009 (Gaurav Tripathi v. State of U.P. and another) and Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 6733 of 2009 (Dr. Abha Pandey v. State of U.P. and another) by the Order dated 10th April, 2009, reported in 2009(4) ADJ 648 (DB) : 2009(3) ESC 1486 (DB) has referred the following question for decision by a larger bench :
“Where in view of the provisions of the U.P. Higher Eduction Services Commission (Procedure for Selection of Teachers) Regulations, 1983, particularly, Regulations 3 and 6 thereof, the Guide-lines framed by the U.P. Higher Eduction Services Commission in the year 2008 in regard to the selection pursuant to Advertisement No. 41 of 2007, wherein “teaching experience” has been provided as one of the factors for preliminary screening and short-listing the candidates to be called for interview for the post of teachers/lecturers are valid.”
Relevant facts leading to the reference
2. It is necessary to notice the relevant facts leading to the reference.
3. The above two writ petitions have been field by the petitioner
(2008) 10 SCC 1 (Para 71)-Distinguished
AIR 1964 SC 436 (Para 73)-Referred.
(2004) 6 SCC 786 (Para 107)-Relied on
JT 1993 (2) SC 138 : (1993) 2 SCC 310 (Para 101)-Considered.
(2001) 8 SCC 676 (Para 180)-Considered.
(2007) 5 SCC 519 (Para 216)-Explained.
AIR 1967 SC 1643 (Para 239 to 241)
(2007) 3 SCC 720 (Para 239)-Considered and explained.
(2007) 3 SCC 720 (Para 267)-Distinguished.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.