R.B.MISRA
Devendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad – Respondent
( 1 ) THE present writ petition has been preferred to quash the order dated 18. 3. 1999 passed by the additional Director (Administration) of Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad,, (inshort called mandi Parishad), U. P. Lucknow (Annexure-18 to the writ petition) and the order dated 10. 3. 1999 passed by the Director, mandi Parishad, as referred in the order dated 18. 9. 1999. The petitioner has inter alia prayed for other relief including for quashing the unreasonable terms and conditions incorporated in the letter dated 5. 7. 1995 of the Managing Director, Sugar Corporation (Annexure-10 to the writ petition) so much so saying that the service of the petitioner had automatically come to an end after expiry of period of one year from the date of joining at mandi Parishad.
( 2 ) HEARD Sri V. B. , Upadhaya, learned Senior Counsel along with Sri Vidya Bhushan Upadhaya, for the petitioner and Sri V. K. Birla, learned Counsel for respondents No. 4 and 5 and Sri Satish mandhyan, learned Counsel for mandi Parishad.
( 3 ) THE facts giving rise to the present writ petition in brief are that the petitioner applied to the post of Junior Engineer (Civil) in respondent U. P. State
Referred to : H. Umapati Choudhary v. State of Bihar
Ratilal B. Soni v. State of Gujarat
State of Mysore v. M.H. Bellary
State of Mysore v. P.N. Nanjundiah
Rameshwar Prasad v. Managing Director, U.P. Rajkiya Nirman Nigam, Ltd.
Npapati Chaudhary v. State of Bihar
S. Pratap Singh v. State of Punjab
Block Development Officer Association v. State of M.P.
Balkrishna Pandey v. State of Bihar
Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. v. Brojo Nath Gangula
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.