YASHWANT VARMA, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
Yogesh Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Estate Officer – Respondent
D.Y. Chandrachud, C.J.
The issue which falls for determination in the present reference to the Full Bench, turns upon the provisions of Section 9 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, [Act]. Section 9 provides for an appeal against an order of the Estate Officer made in respect of public premises under Section 5 or Section 5B or Section 5C or Section 7. As the Section stands, no appeal has been provided against an order of the Estate Officer under Section 5A. Yet, a Division Bench of this Court held in Sanjay Agarwal v. Union of India [Writ C. No. 14580 of 2012 decided on 26 March, 2012] that an appeal in respect of an order made under Section 5A is maintainable under Section 9. When this judgment was cited before the learned single Judge in a batch of writ petitions, the Court found itself unable to agree with the view in Sanjay Agarwal on the ground that the right to appeal is a statutory right and where the statute has not provided an appeal under Section 9 in respect of an order made under Section 5A, an appeal could not be maintained. Hence, the following questions have been referred for decision before the Full Bench [Order dated 16 O
Ganga Bai v. Vijay Kumar, (1974) 2 SCC 393
Gujarat Agro Industries Co. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad, (1999) 4 SCC 468
State of Haryana v. Maruti Udyog Ltd., (2000) 7 SCC 348
Super Cassettes Industries Limited v. State of U.P., (2009) 10 SCC 531
Raj Kumar Shivhare v. Directorate of Enforcement, (2010) 4 SCC 772
Competition Commission of India v. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and another, (2010) 10 SCC 744
Arcot Textile Mills Limited v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, (2013) 16 SCC 1
Kondiba Dagadu Kadam v. Savitribai Sopan Gujar, (1999) 3 SCC 722
Competition Commission of India v. Steel Authority of India Ltd., (2010) 10 SCC 744
Gujarat Agro Industries Co. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad, (1999) 4 SCC 468
Government of Andhra Pradesh v. P Laxmi Devi, (2008) 4 SCC 720
Shyam Kishore v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi, (1993) 1 SCC 22
Vijay Prakash D. Mehta v. Collector of Customs, (1988) 4 SCC 402
Smt Ganga Bai v. Vijay Kumar, (1974) 2 SCC 393
Ashoka Marketing Ltd. v. Punjab National Bank, (1990) 4 SCC 406
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.