RAN VIJAI SINGH, NEERAJ TIWARI
SURESH KUMAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Neeraj Tiwari, J.—We have heard Sri Satish Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D.K. Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent.
2. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has prayed to issue a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 1.8.2013 passed by State Public Service Tribunal, U.P., Lucknow (hereafter referred to as “Tribunal”) in Claim Petition No. 1698 of 2009 and also quash the orders dated 2.3.2009, 22.4.2009 and 21.12.2009. vide order dated 2.3.2009, the disciplinary authority has imposed minor penalty withholding of one increment for the period of one year and also awarded censure entry. With the further direction that with respect to remaining salary for the suspension period and other allowances, decision will be taken after giving show-cause notice. vide order dated 22.4.2009, the disciplinary authority has held that the petitioner will not be entitled for any salary and allowances for the suspension period except which has already been paid to him whereas vide order dated 21.12.2009, the appeal filed by the petitioner against the orders dated 2.3.2009 and 22.4.2009 (supra) has been dismissed.
3. Brie
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.