SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 1064

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SUDHIR AGARWAL, J.
Uttar Pradesh Nursing Assistants Association & Others - Appellants
Versus
Director General Medical Health and Family & Others - Respondents
Writ A. No. 39367 of 1998
Decided On : 31-01-2019

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : C. S. Srivastava, I.R. Singh, S. Srivastava

Headnote:

Public service law – Issue of writ of certiorari quashing order passed by Director General, Medical Health and Family Welfare Service, U.P – Issue of writ of mandamus directing respondents to pay petitioners working as Nursing Assistant salary in the scale of amount as revised from time to time – Petitioner 1 is an Association namely U.P. Nursing Assistants Association –Held, Petitioners' cadre earlier being in “Inferior service”, they claimed retirement and this issue was resolved by Government vide Government Order declaring that Nursing Assistants, at that time, were Class III employees hence would retire on attaining– “Inferior service” and “Superior service” in Group 'D' and all Group 'D' employees now has same age of retirement – Considering work, performance and other relevant factors, Pay Commissions have recommended pay-scale of Nursing Assistants, which comes in category of Group 'D' employees and that has continued – Petitioners also accepted such pay scales –Writ petition lacks merits. (Para 77,78,79)

Facts of the case:

Issue of writ of certiorari quashing order passed by Director General, Medical Health and Family Welfare Service, U.P – Issue of writ of mandamus directing respondents to pay petitioners working as Nursing Assistant salary in the scale of amount as revised from time to time – Petitioner 1 is an Association namely U.P. Nursing Assistants Association.

Findings of the case:

Petitioners' cadre earlier being in “Inferior service”, they claimed retirement and this issue was resolved by Government vide Government Order declaring that Nursing Assistants, at that time, were Class III employees hence would retire on attaining the age– “Inferior service” and “Superior service” in Group 'D' and all Group 'D' employees now has same age of retirement – Considering work, performance and other relevant factors, Pay Commissions have recommended pay-scale of Nursing Assistants, which comes in category of Group 'D' employees and that has continued – Petitioners also accepted such pay scales.

Results: Writ petition lacks merits

ORDER :

Sudhir Agarwal, J.

1. Heard Sri Aadarsh Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri I.R.Singh, learned counsel for petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for respondents and perused the record.

2. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of a writ of certiorari quashing order dated 08.9.1998 passed by Director General, Medical Health and Family Welfare Service, U.P., whereby claim of petitioners claiming Class III status and pay scale of Rs.950-1500 has been rejected. Petitioners have also prayed for issue of a writ of certiorari quashing Government Order dated 18.11.1989 (Annexure 11 to the writ petition) whereby post of 'Nursing Assistant' has been placed in the pay scale of Rs.775-1025 by including it with several other posts forming part of Class IV cadre. Lastly, petitioners have also prayed for issue of a writ of mandamus directing respondents to pay petitioners working as Nursing Assistant salary in the scale of Rs.950-1500, as revised from time to time.

3. Petitioner 1 is an Association namely U.P. Nursing Assistants Association, claimed to have been recognized by State of Uttar Pradesh vide Government letter dated 9.7.1970. It represents the cause of persons working as 'Nursing Assistants' in various Hospitals of State Government. Petitioners 2 and 3 are individuals appointed as “Nursing Assistants” in Government Hospitals and have been impleaded so as to press their individual rights as also they are Members and President, respectively, of Association.

4. Educational qualification for recruitment and appointment to the post of “Nursing Assistant” was/is (i) Matriculation/Intermediate (ii) Second Grade Nursing Certificate of Military Department; (iii) IIIrd Class English Examination of Military Department; and (iv) Five years' experience in dressing nursing and as Attendant in some Medical Hospital.

5. 'Nursing Assistants' are normally posted in small Hospitals having only 10 beds and they work as Male Nurse thereat. Earlier, 'Nursing Assistants' were treated as Class IV employees. Subsequently, vide Government Order dated 18.9.1972, 'Nursing Assistants' were declared class III employees and their age of superannuation was declared as 58 years.

6. In 1972, pay scale recommended by Pay Commission for 'Nursing Assistants' was Rs.175-250. It was a class III pay scale. Qualifications of 'Nursing Assistant' was also Matriculation /Intermediate as also Training Certificate. However, vide Government Order dated 28.11.1989, 'Nursing Assistants' were placed in Class IV category with pay scale of Rs.775-1025.

7. Petitioner 1 represented against aforesaid placing of 'Nursing Assistants' with Class IV employees and claimed that they were entitled to be considered as Class III employees. This demand was forwarded by Director General, Medical Health and Family Welfare, U.P. (hereinafter referred to as “DG, MHFW”) vide letter dated 07.3.1990 to State Government. It recommended that 'Nursing Assistants' of Government of India were given higher pay scale while in State of Uttar Pradesh, pay scale of Class IV employees has been extended to 'Nursing Assistants', which is not justified. Again, a similar demand was made by Petitioner 1-Association, vide letter dated 28.9.1992.

8. Having received no response, Petitioner-1, Association, filed Writ Petition no.2406 of 1993, which was disposed of vide judgment dated 1.5.1998 directing respondents Competent Authority to decide petitioners' representation within two months. The order passed by this Court reads as under :

“The petitioner has made representation before the authorities, who shall consider the said representation in accordance with law within a period of 2 months from the date. The matter is finally disposed of.”

9. Pursuant thereto, impugned order dated 08.9.1998 has been passed by DG, MHFW rejecting claim of petitioners

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top