Gyanesh Shukla vs Chancellor, University Of Lucknow

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(All) 1880

ANIL KUMAR, SAURABH LAVANIA
Gyanesh Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Chancellor, University Of Lucknow – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: I.B.Singh, A.Bharat, A.M.Tripathi, Abhinav N. Trivedi, Anil Kumar Tiwari, J.B.Singh, U N Misra, Adv.
For the Respondent: P.C.Agarwal,Brijesh Kr. Shukla,S.P. Shukla,Savitra Vardhan Singh

Table of Content
1. dismissal based on misconduct and procedural compliance. (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 33 , 34)
2. arguments against the dismissal based on procedural violations. (Para 4 , 10 , 16)
3. final dismissal of the writ petition due to lack of merit. (Para 19 , 53)
4. counsel for opposite parties elaborates on gravity of allegations. (Para 20 , 22 , 28)
5. observations on dignity, conduct, and the role of a teacher. (Para 31 , 44 , 46)
6. differentiation between criminal and disciplinary proceedings. (Para 49 , 52)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Tiwari, Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Aditya Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Brijesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for opposite party no.1 and Sri Savtra Vardhan Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.2.

2. In the instant writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order of dismissal dated 14.02.2000 passed by Lucknow University, Lucknow and order dated 30.09.2000 passed by the Chancellor, Lucknow University, Lucknow. The petitioner was dismissed from the post of Lecturer in Commercial Arts in the College of Arts and Crafts, Lucknow. The allegations of molestation with a girl student are the basis of order of dism

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(All) 1880

ANIL KUMAR, SAURABH LAVANIAGyanesh Shukla – AppellantVersusChancellor, University Of Lucknow – Respondent

Cases Referred (28)

ANIL KUMAR, SAURABH LAVANIA
Gyanesh Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Chancellor, University Of Lucknow – Respondent