SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 1976

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Sudhir Agarwal, Virendra Kumar Srivastava, JJ.
Allahabad Anglo Indian Association Branch Allahabad - Appellant
Vs.
State of U.P. And Others - Respondents
Writ C No. 33630 of 2018
Decided On : 31-10-2019

Advocates Appeared:
Subedar Mishra, Adv., Ajit Kumar Singh, Adv., Nimai Das, Adv., Sudhanshu Srivastava, Adv.

The State's right to resume Nazul land for public purpose is governed by lease terms under the Government Grants Act, 1895, which take precedence over general statutory provisions.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ petition challenging order of State Government regarding resumption of Nazul land - The Court reiterated that the lease concerning Nazul land, governed by the Government Grants Act, 1895, permits re-entry by the State for public purpose under stipulated conditions. The petitioner's claim for renewal through pending application was dismissed on grounds of lease expiry before discretionary exercise of re-entry rights. Notably, the principles of natural justice need not apply to non-statutory contracts. (Paras 1, 4, 8, 10, 100)

(B) Nazul Land - Definition and Jurisdiction - The concept of Nazul is explored, indicating it as land owned by the State under sovereign right, and distinct from property acquired under standard land acquisition laws. (Paras 15, 17, 23)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, an association, contested a government order for resuming control of Nazul land, asserting prior rights despite lease expiration. The land was designated for public developmental use. (Paras 1, 4)

Findings of Court:
The petition was dismissed, affirming the State's right to resume land for public interest purposes, with adequate provisions already stipulated in the lease agreement claiming priority over general law. (Paras 101)

Issues: The court addressed the legality of the right of resumption, the definition of Nazul land, appropriate statutory provisions, and whether due process was violated regarding natural justice in re-entry procedures. (Paras 12)

Ratio Decidendi: The ruling emphasized that Nazul land arrangements are contracts bound by specific terms that supersede general laws, and the State’s re-entry does not necessitate a detailed justification beyond those contract terms. (Paras 100, 102)

Result: Writ petition dismissed; petitioner ordered to vacate the land within one month.

Table of Content
1. petition challenges resumption of property rights. (Para 1 , 2)
2. lease history and state rights asserted. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments regarding lease renewal and state actions. (Para 10 , 11)
4. clarification on 'nazul' land ownership. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. legal foundation of state rights over nazul lands. (Para 18 , 22 , 24)
6. conclusion on re-entry rights and legal implications. (Para 79 , 80 , 81 , 100)
7. court orders immediate vacating of disputed land. (Para 101 , 102)

JUDGMENT :

Sudhir Agarwal, J.

Allahabad Anglo Indian Association through its Secretary Mr. Larry Adrian Michael French has filed this petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India challenging order dated 31.08.2018 passed by Collector, Allahabad (respondent 2) informing petitioner that State Government has exercised right of resumption/re-entry over disputed Nazul land, therefore, it should be vacated by petitioner within two months failing which possession shall be taken forcibly at the cost of petitioner.

2. Dispute relates to Plot no.131, Civil Station Allahabad, area 11 acres 1730 square yards, situate at 9th Thornhill Road.

3. Secretary of State for India in Council executed a lease deed dated 07.05.1921 in favour of Anglo Indian Association granting lease of aforesaid Nazul Plot No.131 for a period of 50 years commencing from 12.06.1917. It was said in the lease deed that earlier lease was executed on 12.06.1867 in favour of one Robert Andrew Farhe for a period of 50 years and after expiry of said period a new lease was to be executed, hence, said lease was executed. Several bungalows were constructed over leased land for residence of Anglo Indian persons. Last extension of lease was vide renewal dated 07.03.1984 which commenced from 1967 and expired in 1997. Petitioner then made an application for renewal of lease but the same remained pending and ultimately vide order dated 12.03.2012 respondent-2 cancelled lease granted to petitioner and matter was referred to State Government. A meeting was held in the Office of Secretary, Housing and Urban Planning on 26.11.2015 in which Representatives of Petitioner-Association as also Additional District Magistrate (Nazul) Allahabad and Special Officer on Duty, Allahabad Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as "ADA") participated. Following decision was taken in the said meeting :

    ^^¼1½ fn vky bf.M;k ,aXyks bf.M;Uk ,lksfl,'ku] 'kk[kk bykgkckn dk iVVk fujLr fd, tkus ls lEcaf/kr ftykf/kdkjh] bykgkckn ds vkns'k fnukad 12-03-2012 tks rduhdh n`f”V ls lgh ugh ik;k x;k gS dks 'kklu ds vkns'k ds ek/;e ls fujLr djus dh dk;Zokgh dh tk;sA

    ¼2½ fn vky bf.M;k ,Xyks bf.M;u ,lksfl,'ku] 'kk[kk bykgkckn ¼iVVsnkj½ }kjk iVVs ds uohudj.k gsrq ftykf/kdkjh] bykgkckn dks fu;ekuqlkj vkosnu i= izLrqr djsaxsA

    ¼3½ ftykf/kdkjh] bykgkckn bl izdj.k dk ijh{k.k dj rF;kRed fjiksVZ viuh laLrqfr lfgr jkT; ljdkj dks miyC/k djk;saxsA jkT; ljdkj }kjk bl laca/k esa esfjV ds vk/kkj ij lqlaxr fu;eksa ds vraZxr l{ke Lrj ls fu.kZ; ysdj vfxze dk;Zokgh dh tk;sxhA

    "(1) Proceeding to be conducted through order of the Government for cancellation of order dated 12.03.2012 of District Magistrate, Allahabad pertaining to cancellation of lease granted to All Indian Anglo Indian Association, Branch Allahabad, which order has been found not to be technically correct.

    (2) An application shall be presented as per Rules to the District Magistrate, Allahabad by All India Anglo Indian Association, Allahabad Branch (Lease Holder) for renewal of lease.

    (3) District Magistrate, Allahabad after examining this matter shall make available the factual report along with his recommendation to State Government. Further action shall be taken by State Government after ensuring decision at the level of Competent Authority, on merits under the relevant Rules." (English translation by Court)

4. Thereafter respondent 2 has passed order dated 31.08.2018 pointing out that lease expired on 11.06.1997 and now land in dispute is required for "public purpose" in v

                          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                          1
                          2
                          3
                          4
                          5
                          6
                          7
                          8
                          9
                          10
                          11
                          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                          supreme today icon
                          logo-black

                          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                          Please visit our Training & Support
                          Center or Contact Us for assistance

                          qr

                          Scan Me!

                          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                          whatsapp-icon Back to top