RAMESH SINHA, SAROJ YADAV
Mohd. Faiyyaz Mansuri Thru. Brother Mohd. Siraj – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India Thru. Secy. Min. Of Home N. Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ramesh Sinha, J.
1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the detenue/petitioner, Mohd. Faiyyaz Mansuri, through his next friend/brother Mohd. Siraj, challenging the order of detention dated 17.09.2020 passed by the District Magistrate, Lakhimpur Kheri under Section 3 (2) of the National Security Act, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as “N.S.A.”), the order of approval dated 25.09.2020 passed by the Under Secretary, Home (Confidential) Department, Government of Uttar Pradesh under Section 3(4) of the N.S.A. and the order of confirmation dated 28.10.2020 passed by the Under Secretary, Home (Confidential) Department, Government of Uttar Pradesh under Section 12(1) of the N.S.A.
2. During pendency of the instant writ petition, the State Government has extended the detention of the detenue/ petitioner for a further period of six months from the date of detention i.e. 17.09.2020, vide order dated 08.12.2020, which is also challenged by the detenue/petitioner by means of amendment.
3. The prejudicial activities of the petitioner/detenue impelling the third respondent (District Magistrate, Lakhimpur Kheri) to clamp the impugned dete
Gulam Abbas and others vs. State of U.P. and others
K.M. Abdulla Kunhi Vs. Union of India
Kundanbhai Dulabhai Shaikh Vs. Distt. Magistrate Ahmedabad
Lahu Shrirang Gatkal Vs. State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and others
Mohinuddin @ Moin Master Vs. District Magistrate Beed
Naresh Kumar Goyal v. Union of India and others
State of U.P. vs. Sanjay Pratap Gupta :2004 (8) SCC 591
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.