SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 1007

JAYANT BANERJI
Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rajesh Kumar Mishra

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Shri Rajesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Awadhesh Chandra Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. By means of this petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 31.12.2009 passed by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue), Moradabad in Case No.407/09 under Section 33/40/47 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899[Act] whereby, by means of an ex-parte order, deficiency of stamp has been imposed upon the petitioner while relying upon the report dated 16.10.2009 of the Assistant Inspector General of Registration. Further under challenge is the order dated 26.05.2010 passed by the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Moradabad Mandal, Moradabad, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 56 of the Act, being Appeal No.74/2009-10, has been partly allowed by reducing the amount of penalty imposed upon the petitioner.

3. The facts as mentioned in the petition are that the petitioner purchased an area of 0.002 hectares from Khasra No.869-Ka, an area of 0.130 hectares from K

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top