CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Pradeep Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Punit Kumar Gupta, Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner purchased plot Nos. 1198, 1199, 1200, 1208, 1209, 1210, 1211, 1212, 1213 total nine plots area 1.2030 hectare of Khata No. 410 situated in Village Kalaha Pargana Baghpat Tehsil Khekatha District Baghpat by registered sale deed dated 29.4.2010 from Smt. Kalawati wife of Shri Maniram for sale consideration of Rs. 5 lakhs on stamp duty of Rs. 5 lakhs 60 thousand. Owner of the plot Smt. Kalawati lodged a First Information Report under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of I.P.C. in respect to the aforementioned sale deed executed in favour of the petitioner. Smt. Kalawati also filed a suit No. 70 of 2010 for cancellation of sale deed on the ground of fraud. Civil Court vide judgement and decree dated 31.5.2010 decreed the suit on the basis of compromise dated 25.5.2010 cancelling the sale deed executed on 29.4.2010. A report dated 14.5.2010 was submitted by Sub-Registrar to Assistant Registrar to the effect that in East of disputed plot there is a road, in South residential house and agricultural plots are located,
Ashok Kumar Dubey vs. State of U.P. and others
Ram Iqbal Singh and others vs. State of U.P. and others
Ram Khelawan @ Bachcha vs. State of U.P.
Ram Khilawan @ Bachcha vs. State of U.P. and another
Smt. Pushpa Sareen Vs. State of U.P.
Smt. Vijaya Jain vs. State of U.P.
State of U.P. v. Ambush Tandon
Sumatinath Jain vs. State of U.P.
Vijay Kumar & another vs. Commissioner, Meerut Division, Meerut
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.