SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2109

CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
X-Juvenile – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ali Hasan, Istiyaq Ali.
For the Respondent: Ashish Pandey.

Table of Content
1. facts of the case regarding juvenile and charges (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's observations on proceedings and parties' submissions (Para 3 , 4 , 7 , 8)
3. arguments regarding the application and illegalities (Para 5 , 6)
4. interpretation of section 12 of jj act, 2015 (Para 9 , 10)
5. conditions for bail refusal and case law precedent (Para 11 , 12)
6. social investigation report findings of the juvenile (Para 13 , 14)
7. justification for granting bail based on previous cases (Para 15)
8. final order granting bail to the juvenile (Para 16 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT :

CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.

1. Heard Mr. Ali Hasan assisted by Mr. Istiyaq Ali learned counsel for the revisionist and Smt. Vijeta Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Ashish Pandey, learned counsel for opposite party No. 2/Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Lucknow.

2. The brief facts of the case are that a first information report has been lodged on 18.08.2021 against Chhote @ Mohd. Sahid Khan, Raju@ Saif, Saleem, Shoeb, Faim, Nasim, Wasim, Munna and Hasim which was registered as Case Crime No. 253 of 2021 under Sections 8 /21/29/30/22C/25/27A NDPS Act at Police Station-Fatehganj Purvi District-Bareilly wit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top