SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 708

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ATTAU RAHMAN MASOODI, VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, JJ.
Kusum Lata Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others – Respondents
Writ C No.28249 of 2021, 3276, 1485, 9460, 1600, 1594 of 2022
Decided on : 25-07-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Siddharth Khare, Uma Nath Pandey, Awadhesh Prasad, Radhey Shyam Singh, Vipin Kumar, Mahesh Sharma, Rajesh Kumar Patel, Ashish Kumar, Deepak Kumar Pandey
For the Respondent: Tarun Agrawal, Yatindra

Headnote:

Disaster Management Act, 2005 - Section 12, (iii), 38, (2), (2)(l), 71, 73, 74 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14,21, 38 – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section-9 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section-52 - Disaster Management Act, 2003 - Section 12 (iii) - COVID-19 Death - Gratia Payment - Whether a COVID-19 death for purposes of ex-gratia payment is rightly regulated and understood by executive as per Clause-12 of Government Order - Whether defence put forth is violative of object of equality read with purpose of Section 12(iii) of Act of 2005 - Whether victims named in chart set out hereinabove have died of Covid-19 or otherwise – Held, For any claim that has trammelled in law through a government order within scope of Section 12 read with Section 38 of Act of 2005, jurisdiction has been vested in Supreme Court of India and High Courts to entertain a proceeding of suit or other proceeding, hence this Court is convinced that all writ petitions filed for payment of ex-gratia amount are maintainable - This is, however, not to suggest that Article 21 of Constitution of India in matter of pandemic or disasters imposes a blanket pecuniary liability upon State as regards loss of life of citizens or their property to which any negligence of State authorities or agents or misconstruction of a policy decision arrived at for a larger purpose is an exception – Court is of considered opinion that field of compensation beyond scope of section 12 (iii) of Disaster Management Act, 2003 is well protected as against negligence or things not done in good faith irrespect of any measure such as ex-gratia but in present case it is claim of ex-gratia payment which Court is concerned with – Court find that deaths having taken place in hospitals on account of Covid-19 fully stand test of certification - Argument that medical reports mentioning cardiac failure or otherwise may not be attributed to Covid-19 does not impress Court for reason that Covid-19 is an infection that may result to mortality of a person affecting any organ be it lungs or heart etc - Writ petitions are allowed and opposite parties are directed to release ex-gratia payment to dependents entitled thereto within a period of one month failing which claims so allowed shall be made good inclusive of simple interest @ 9% p.m. from date of judgment upto date of actual payment - Petitions allowed.

JUDGMENT :

Atttau Rahman Masoodi, J.

1. This batch of writ petitions involving common question of facts and law were heard together and are being decided by a common judgment.

2. The petitioners have questioned the legality of Clause 12 of the Government Order dated 1st June, 2021, which was issued in modification of the earlier Government Orders dated 6th April, 2021 and 4th May, 2021. By means of the impugned government order, the State of Uttar Pradesh raised the amount of ex-gratia payment to the dependants of a deceased employee dying on election duty due to COVID-19 from Rs.15 lacs to Rs.30 lacs subject to the fulfilment of conditions in Clause-12.

3. In usual course, the National Authority by virtue of Section 12 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 is empowered to recommend guidelines for the minimum standards of relief which is to be provided to persons affected by disaster. Section 12 of the Act of 2005 for ready reference is extracted hereunder:-

    “12. Guidelines for minimum standards of relief. -The National Authority shall recommend guidelines for the minimum standards of relief to be provided to persons affected by disaster, which shall include,-

(i) the minimum requirements to be provided in the relief camps in relation to shelter, food, drinking water, medical cover and sanitation;

(ii) the special provisions to be made for widows and orphans;

(iii) ex gratia assistance on account of loss of life as also assistance on account of damage to houses and for restoration of means of livelihood;

(iv) such other relief as may be necessary.”

4. It is evident from the above quoted provision that ex-gratia assistance on account of loss of life is one of the measures for restoration of the means of livelihood to the members of aggrieved family. The State Government is also empowered under Section 38 of the Act of 2005 to take measures defined under Section 38(2) which include the financial help in the nature of ex-gratia payment under Section 38(2)(l) and this is how the aforesaid government orders have come to be issued for compensating the loss of lives to the dependants of those who on being deputed to perform election duties in the U.P. Panchayat Elections – 2021 contracted COVID-19 and died. Section 38(2)(l) for ready reference is reproduced hereunder:-

    “Section 38(2)(l):-such other matter as it deems necessary or expedient for the purpose of securing effective implementation of provisions of this Act.”

5. A person having contracted pandemic i.e. COVID-19 while on election duty became a matter of consideration in the light of recommendations made by the Election Commission of India as well as the National Authority. Therefore, to avoid litigation as against the claims which may have arisen on account of the death of a person discharging election duty by his dependants, the ex-gratia payment to the tune of Rs.30 lacs was a measure evolved by the State Government to compensate the dependants of any such loss of life, whose death occurred on account of COVID-19 having been contracted while on election duty. The Election Commission of India for the purpose of ex-gratia payment is said to have defined the election duty to mean the performance of such duty by leaving one's house on a scheduled day till a person returned back home. The election duty included training, polling duty, counting duty or any other duty relating to election. It implies that contracting COVID-19 while on election duty after leaving one's place of residence till reaching back home was the range of movement to which every case has to be corroborated.

6. In the present case, the U.P. Panchayat Election was notified in the month of March, 2021 whereafter the schedule of election duty in various capacities came to be issued on 6th April, 2021. The chart below indicates the relevant details as regards the petitioners being sent on election duty, date of diagnosis of C

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top