IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Manoj Kumar Gupta, Chandra Kumar Rai, JJ.
Shadab Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. And Others – Respondents
Special Appeal No. 466 of 2022
Decided On : 07-06-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Section 12C - Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 5 - Special appeal - Procedure before Judge – Power of High court to issue writs - Respondent raised a preliminary objection to maintainability of instant special appeal - It is submitted that present special appeal is barred as it is directed against order of learned Single Judge passed under Article 226 in respect of an order passed by Election Tribunal constituted under U.P. Act. It is urged that in view of specific exclusion made under Chapter VIII, Rule 5 of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952, this appeal is incompetent – Held, Sub Divisional Magistrate, while passing order has clearly mentioned that order is being passed by him, acting as prescribed authority under Act - Under Section 12-C of Act, election petition lies before such authority as may be prescribed - It is not case of appellant that Sub Divisional Magistrate is not authority prescribed to deal with a petition under Section 12-C. contention that election petition was not presented in manner prescribed could be considered, had appeal been maintainable - As this appeal is not maintainable, Court cannot arrogate to ourselves power to dwell on issue - Likewise, provision relating to revision before District Judge, will not detract from legal position that proceedings originate from an order of Election Tribunal under U.P. Act - Special appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. This intra-Court appeal is directed against the order dated 25.05.2022 passed by a learned Single Judge in a writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 13.05.2022 passed by the Prescribed Authority/Sub Divisional Magistrate Baberu in a petition filed against him under Section 12-C of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 challenging his election as Gram Pradhan of Gram Sabha Hardauli.
2. Sri Gajendra Pratap, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Virendra Singh, appearing on behalf of respondent no.5 raised a preliminary objection to the maintainability of the instant special appeal. It is submitted that the present special appeal is barred as it is directed against the order of learned Single Judge passed under Article 226 in respect of an order passed by the Election Tribunal constituted under U.P. Act. It is urged that in view of specific exclusion made under Chapter VIII, Rule 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952, this appeal is incompetent.
3. On the other hand, Sri Shailendra, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri S.N. Iqbal appearing for the appellant submitted that the special appeal is perfectly maintainable, inasmuch as, the election petition itself was still-born not having been presented in the manner prescribed; that the Act itself contemplates filing of revision before District Judge which shows that the Sub Divisional Magistrate while exercising power under Section 12-C of the U.P. Act does not act as an Election Tribunal but in administrative capacity; and in any view, the Election Tribunal does not have trappings of civil court.
4. The facts necessary for disposal of the instant appeal are that respondent no.5 presented a petition under Section 12C of U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred as 'the Act') challenging the election of the appellant on the post of Gram Pradhan. The appellant filed an application on 18.08.2021 raising various issues touching upon the maintainability of the election petition. On 13.05.2022, respondent no.3 i.e. Prescribed Authority/U.P. Zila Adhikari, Baberu, Banda while acting as Election Tribunal directed for recounting of the ballots. Aggrieved thereby, the appellant filed writ petition no.14609 of 2022 before this Court which was allowed in part and recounting of only polling booth no.103, ward no.5, Gram Panchayat-Hardauli was permitted. Being further aggrieved thereby, the instant appeal has been filed.
5. The provision relating to intra-Court appeal is governed by Chapter VIII, Rule 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952. It reads as follows :
6. The above provision has come up for interpretation in reference to orders passed by Election Tribunals under Section 12-C of U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 in Vajara Yojna Seed Farm, Kalyanpur (M/s.) & others vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court II, U.P., Kanpur & another, 2003 (1) UPLBEC 496.
7. Paragraphs 59, 60, 61 & 62 of the said judgment specificall
The Election Tribunal cannot simultaneously allow an election petition and order a recount, as it becomes functus officio after deciding the petition.
An election tribunal cannot allow a recount after a final decision on an election petition, as it becomes functus officio, violating jurisdictional limits established by precedent.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between interlocutory orders and final orders under Section 12-C(6) of the U.P. Panchayati Raj Act, 1947, and the availability of t....
A recounting order is interlocutory and can be challenged through a writ; adequate statutory remedy exists through revision for final orders only.
An election petition under the Act of 1994 can only be heard by a District Judge or by a Civil Judge or Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division) subordinate to him.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.