SAURABH LAVANIA
Kusum Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Heard.
2. Present petition has been filed for the following main reliefs:
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties not to interfere in the functioning of the Petitioner as validly elected Gram Pradhan of Gram Panchayat-Naubasta, Block Lakshmanpur, District-Pratapgarh, in the interest of justice.”
3. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the side opposite stated that the present petition, challenging the order dated 05.06.2023 passed by the opposite party No. 2-Prescribed Authority/Sub Divisional Officer, Lalganj, District-Pratapgarh, in the proceedings instituted under Section 12-C of U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 (in short “Act of 1947”) registered as Case No. 3146 of 2021, Computerized Case No. T2021102570203146, whereby, the proceedings ins
Abrar vs. State of U.P. (2004) 5 AWC 4088 : 2004 All. L.J. 2384
Bengal Immunity Company Ltd. vs. State of Bihar
Dana Rajeshwari vs. Bodavula Hanumayamma and Others
Hari Vishnu Kamath vs. Syed Ahmad Ishaque and Others
Kattinokkula Murali Krishna vs. Veeramalla Kotewara Rao and Others
Mahendra Pratap vs. Krishn Pal and Others
M. Chinnasamy vs. K.C. Palanisamy and Others
Punjab Land Development and Reclamation Corporation Limited vs. Labour Court
Ram Sewak Yadav vs. Hussain Kamil Kidwai
Sundeep Kumar Bafna vs. State of Maharashtra
The doctrine of functus officio prevents a judicial authority from revisiting a matter once it has been finally decided, ensuring the finality of judicial decisions.
The Election Tribunal cannot simultaneously allow an election petition and order a recount, as it becomes functus officio after deciding the petition.
An election tribunal cannot allow a recount after a final decision on an election petition, as it becomes functus officio, violating jurisdictional limits established by precedent.
A recounting order is interlocutory and can be challenged through a writ; adequate statutory remedy exists through revision for final orders only.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between interlocutory orders and final orders under Section 12-C(6) of the U.P. Panchayati Raj Act, 1947, and the availability of t....
After finally deciding an election petition by allowing it and directing recount, the prescribed authority becomes functus officio lacking jurisdiction for subsequent orders declaring results based o....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.