JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ajay Singh, learned counsel for the contesting respondent nos. 2 & 3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.

2. Amendment application is allowed, let the amendment be carried out forthwith.

3. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed for calling the records and quashing the order dated 18.11.2020 passed by respondent no. 2, impugned herein this petition.

4. Instructions obtained by Sri Ajay Singh, learned counsel for the contesting respondent nos. 2 & 3 placed before the Court, are taken on record. Since the instructions are complete and learned counsel for the respondent submits that those were the ultimate instructions and the matter may be decided, the Court proceeds to decide the matter finally.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has retired from Allahabad Development Authority on 28.02.2019 on attaining the age of superannuation and claims that even though he was initially engaged by the respondent Development Authority as a daily wage Supervisor but he is entitled for pensionary benefits on the ground that once his service