IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
Nasreen Fatima – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others – Respondents
Writ A No.6713 of 2017
Decided on : 18-05-2022
Appointment - Principal - U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Section 16E(1)(2), Section 16FF, Regulations 17-19 - The petitioner sought quashing of the order refusing financial approval to her appointment as Principal. The Court held that the petitioner possessed the requisite qualifications and teaching experience certificate from a recognized institution. The impugned decision was quashed for being bad in law and in violation of principles of natural justice. The matter was remitted back for a fresh decision.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought quashing of the order refusing financial approval to her appointment as Principal. The petitioner possessed the requisite qualifications and teaching experience certificate from a recognized institution. The impugned decision was quashed for being bad in law and in violation of principles of natural justice. The matter was remitted back for a fresh decision.
Finding of the Court:
The impugned decision was quashed for being bad in law and in violation of principles of natural justice. The matter was remitted back for a fresh decision.
Issues: The issues included the validity of the petitioner's qualifications and teaching experience certificate, the legality of the impugned decision, and the violation of principles of natural justice.
Ratio Decidendi: The petitioner possessed the requisite qualifications and teaching experience certificate from a recognized institution. The impugned decision was quashed for being bad in law and in violation of principles of natural justice. The matter was remitted back for a fresh decision.
Final Decision: The present writ petition is allowed subject to the observations made above.
JUDGMENT :
1. Supplementary counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent-Committee of Management in Court today is taken on record.
2. Heard Mr. Radha Kant Ojha, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Mansoor Ahmad, Mr. Maqsood Ahmad Beg and Mr. B.P. Singh Somwashi, learned counsel for the respondent-Committee of Management and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
3. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 4th September, 2015 passed by the Joint Director of Education, Allahabad Division, Allahabad (now Prayagraj) i.e. respondent no.3 as well as for quashing the communication letter of the District Inspector of Schools, Fatehpur dated 7th January, 2016. Petitioner has also prayed that a direction be issued to the respondents to make payment of salary of the petitioner w.e.f. 12th August, 2015 to till date including the arrears and also pay the salary regularly as and when it becomes due.
4. By means of the letter-cum-order dated 4th September, 2015, respondent no.3 has informed the Manager of Inter College Dhauli, Fatehpur that the recommendation of the Committee of Management to accord financial approval to the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Principal of the said institution has been refused by the Regional Level Committee. In the said letter/order, it has been mentioned that on an opinion being obtained, it has been informed by the U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board, Allahabad vide his letter dated 11th August, 2015 that the teachers working in recognized unaided institutions are treated to be part-time teachers due to which their experience is not accepted to be valid. Therefore, it is not possible for the Regional Level Committee to accord financial approval to the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Principal of the institution, as she possesses teaching experience certificate from an unaided institution. The same information has been sent by the District Inspector of Schools, Fatehpur to the Manager of the Inter College, Pauli, District Fatehpur vide his letter dated 7th January, 2016, which is also under challenge in the present writ petition.
5. Relevant facts as borne out from the records of the present writ petition, are as follows:
The eligibility criteria for appointment as an Officiating/Incharge Principal of an Intermediate College recognized and governed under the Intermediate Education Act, 1921.
Eligibility for the appointment of a principal must be assessed as of the vacancy date, and subsequent qualifications can establish entitlement to the position.
Appointments obtained through forged documents are void ab initio, and failure to comply with verification processes undermines claims to employment despite long service, reaffirming minority institu....
Point of law: Teacher – Appointment - Respondents are estopped, having allowed the petitioner all throughout in the stages of process, treating her to be eligible and offering appointment, to contend....
Teaching experience for appointment as Headmaster must be from recognized regular teaching positions, not from part-time or non-cadre roles, adhering strictly to statutory qualifications.
The qualifications for appointment must be judged by the rules in force at the time of selection, not by subsequent amendments.
The judgment establishes the principle that public officers must act reasonably and responsibly in their official duties, conforming to the rule of law. It also emphasizes the importance of ensuring ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.