SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 777

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
Nasreen Fatima – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others – Respondents
Writ A No.6713 of 2017
Decided on : 18-05-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Niyaz Ahmad Khan, Mansoor Ahmad, Mohd. Abrar Khan
For the Respondent: Maqsood Ahmad Beg

Headnote:

Appointment - Principal - U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Section 16E(1)(2), Section 16FF, Regulations 17-19 - The petitioner sought quashing of the order refusing financial approval to her appointment as Principal. The Court held that the petitioner possessed the requisite qualifications and teaching experience certificate from a recognized institution. The impugned decision was quashed for being bad in law and in violation of principles of natural justice. The matter was remitted back for a fresh decision.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought quashing of the order refusing financial approval to her appointment as Principal. The petitioner possessed the requisite qualifications and teaching experience certificate from a recognized institution. The impugned decision was quashed for being bad in law and in violation of principles of natural justice. The matter was remitted back for a fresh decision.

Finding of the Court:

The impugned decision was quashed for being bad in law and in violation of principles of natural justice. The matter was remitted back for a fresh decision.

Issues: The issues included the validity of the petitioner's qualifications and teaching experience certificate, the legality of the impugned decision, and the violation of principles of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi: The petitioner possessed the requisite qualifications and teaching experience certificate from a recognized institution. The impugned decision was quashed for being bad in law and in violation of principles of natural justice. The matter was remitted back for a fresh decision.

Final Decision: The present writ petition is allowed subject to the observations made above.

JUDGMENT :

1. Supplementary counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent-Committee of Management in Court today is taken on record.

2. Heard Mr. Radha Kant Ojha, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Mansoor Ahmad, Mr. Maqsood Ahmad Beg and Mr. B.P. Singh Somwashi, learned counsel for the respondent-Committee of Management and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

3. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 4th September, 2015 passed by the Joint Director of Education, Allahabad Division, Allahabad (now Prayagraj) i.e. respondent no.3 as well as for quashing the communication letter of the District Inspector of Schools, Fatehpur dated 7th January, 2016. Petitioner has also prayed that a direction be issued to the respondents to make payment of salary of the petitioner w.e.f. 12th August, 2015 to till date including the arrears and also pay the salary regularly as and when it becomes due.

4. By means of the letter-cum-order dated 4th September, 2015, respondent no.3 has informed the Manager of Inter College Dhauli, Fatehpur that the recommendation of the Committee of Management to accord financial approval to the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Principal of the said institution has been refused by the Regional Level Committee. In the said letter/order, it has been mentioned that on an opinion being obtained, it has been informed by the U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board, Allahabad vide his letter dated 11th August, 2015 that the teachers working in recognized unaided institutions are treated to be part-time teachers due to which their experience is not accepted to be valid. Therefore, it is not possible for the Regional Level Committee to accord financial approval to the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Principal of the institution, as she possesses teaching experience certificate from an unaided institution. The same information has been sent by the District Inspector of Schools, Fatehpur to the Manager of the Inter College, Pauli, District Fatehpur vide his letter dated 7th January, 2016, which is also under challenge in the present writ petition.

5. Relevant facts as borne out from the records of the present writ petition, are as follows:

    Intermediate College, Pauli, District Fatehpur is an institution duly recognized by the Board of secondary Education of the State of Uttar Pradesh. As the said institution is in the grand-in-aid list of the State Government, the teachers and other employees of the said institution including the Principal are getting their salary from State exchequer under the provisions of U.P. High School and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salary to the Teachers and Other Employees) Act, 1971. As the vacancy of the post of Principal occurred in the institution, the Committee of Management of the said institution applied for permission to advertise the said post. However, the Committee of Management of the institution was informed that as the institution has been conferred the minority status, no prior permission for publication of the post of Principal of the institution is required. Therefore, an advertisement was accordingly made in two daily news papers, namely, one in Hindi, namely, Amar Ujala and second in English, namely, Northern Indian Patrika on 25th March, 2015, which were having adequate circulations. Pursuant to the said advertisement, various prospective candidates sent their applications forms through registered post. Petitioner, who possessed the degrees of High School (in the year 1994), Intermediate (in the year 1996), B.A. (in the year 1999), M.A. (in the year 2004 and B.Ed. (in the year 2011) examinations and also teaching experience of six years, six months and nine days w.e.f. 2nd July, 2008 to that date, from Ganesh Shanker Vidyarthee Balika Intermediate College, Sultanpur

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top