SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 740

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MANOJ MISRA, SAMEER JAIN, JJ.
Sanjay Singh @ Bhooray – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. – 1407, 1069, 1223 of 2007
Decided on : 27-05-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Smt. Shubhra Singh, Abhay Raj Singh, Ashutosh Tewari, Atul Kumar Shahi, Jitendra Pal Singh, Manoj Kumar Singh, Pradeep Kumar Singh, S.K. Singh, S.N.Pandey, S.W. Ali, Sadhna Upadhayay, Vinay Kumar Tripathi

Headnote:

The prosecution story was based on circumstantial evidence. The deceased was abducted and killed. Ransom was demanded and paid. The body was recovered at the instance of the accused. The accused were convicted under Sections 364, 302/34, 201, and 420 IPC. The High Court analyzed the evidence and found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. The recovery of the body was doubtful. The accused were acquitted.

Fact of the Case:

The deceased, Parminder Singh, went missing on 03.04.2003. A ransom call was received by the informant, Nirmol Singh, on 05.04.2003. The informant received another ransom call on 16.04.2003, and a third ransom call on 18.04.2003. The informant paid Rs.50,000/- to the accused on 18.04.2003. The body of the deceased was recovered on 06.05.2003 at the instance of the accused Sanjay Singh @ Bhooray. The accused were arrested and charged with offences punishable under Sections 364, 302/34, 201, and 420 IPC.

Issues: 1. Whether the prosecution proved the case beyond a reasonable doubt? 2. Whether the recovery of the body was genuine?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. 2. The recovery of the body was doubtful.

Final Decision: The accused were acquitted.

JUDGMENT :

MANOJ MISRA, J.

1. These three appeals are against a common judgment and order dated 23.01.2007 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.3, Pilibhit in S.T. No.797 of 2003 connected with S.T. No.212 of 2004, arising out of Case Crime No.320 of 2003, P.S. Bilsanda, District Pilibhit, whereby, the appellants Sanjay Singh @ Bhooray (appellant in Criminal appeal No.1407 of 2007), Vipin Singh (appellant in Criminal appeal No.1069 of 2007), Sompal Singh (whose Criminal appeal no.1063 of 2007 was abated by order dated 19.01.2022) and Bare (appellant in Criminal Appeal No.1223 of 2007) were convicted under Sections 364, 302 / 34, 201 and 420 IPC and were sentenced to imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.2500/-coupled with default sentence of additional six months each under Section 364 IPC and Section 302/34 IPC; three years R.I. and fine of Rs.2,500/-coupled with a default sentence of additional six months under section 201 IPC; and three years R.I. and fine of Rs.2500/-under Section 420 IPC coupled with a default sentence of additional six months. All sentences to run concurrently. It be clarified that in S.T. No.797 of 2003, three accused, namely, Sanjay Singh @ Bhooray (appellant in Criminal Appeal No.1407 of 2007); Vipin Singh (appellant in Criminal Appeal No.1069 of 2007); and Sompal Singh (appellant in Criminal Appeal No.1063 of 2007), were tried; whereas, in S.T. No.212 of 2004, Bare (appellant in Criminal Appeal No.1063 of 2007) was tried. Criminal Appeal No.1063 of 2007 separately filed by Sompal Singh was abated vide order dated 19.01.2022 consequent to his death.

INTRODUCTORY FACTS

2. The prosecution story elicited from the written report (Ex. Ka1) is that on 01.04.2003 Sanjay Singh @ Bhooray, a resident of Village Majhgawa, P.S Bilsanda, District Pilibhit, came to informant's (PW-4's) house at village Jamuniya Jagatpur, P.S. Pooranpur, District Pilibhit and invited informant's son Parminder (the deceased) to Majhgawa. In response to that invite, on 03.04.2003 the deceased went on a cycle to Pooranpur, parked his cycle at the shop of Arvind (PW-1) and told PW-1 that he is going to the house of Bhooray at Majhgawa and would return by evening. But the deceased did not return. On 05.04.2003, at about 1.30 pm, PW-4 (the informant) received a call demanding Rs.2,00,000/- for release of his son. The voice on the phone appeared to be of Bhooray. After receiving the call, on 05.04.2003 itself, PW-4 with Kashmir Singh (not examined), Sukhvinder Singh (PW-3), Sukhveer Singh (not examined) and Ravi Azad (PW-2) went to Bhooray's house at Majhgawa. There, Bhooray and other villagers admitted that Parminder Singh (the deceased) had come to Majhgawa and on 04.04.2003 he had lunch with Sanjay, Bare, Vipin and Som Pal at Som Pal’s house at Rautapur. But Bhooray did not disclose as to where PW-4's son go after having lunch. As a result, information was given to the police of P.S. Bilsanda regarding abduction of informant’s son. Upon this information, the police of P.S. Bilsanda neither registered a report nor arrested Bhooray but enquired from Sanjay @ Bhooray. Thereafter, on 16.04.2003, and two days thereafter, Bhooray called (phoned) the informant to bring Rs.50,000/-at Madnapur Chauraha, Jalalabad, at 2 pm, to secure release of his son. On this call, PW-4 and PW-3 along with Kashmir Singh (not examined) and Harjinder Singh (not examined) took the money to the specified place and gave it to Sanjay @ Bhooray. There, with Sanjay there was an unknown person. After receiving the money and extending the promise that informant’s son would be released in 20 minutes, Bhooray went away with the money. Informant waited there till evening, but his son was not released. By making these allegations and by adding that Sanjay Singh's cousin Manju Singh (a widow) had close relations with informant's son (the deceased), which was not palatable to Sanjay Singh @ Bhooray and his family members, the written report was got lodged by expressing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top