SUNEET KUMAR
Vimal Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Up Thru Prin. Secy. Urban Devpt. And employment – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Suneet Kumar, J.
1. Heard Sri Apporva Tewari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Kazim Ibrahim, learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 2 & 3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. Petitioner has raised challenge to the order dated 8 July 2020, passed by the second respondent, Director State Urban Development Agency (for short ‘SUDA’), repatriating the petitioner to his parent department. A further challenge has been raised to the consequential order dated 15 July 2020, whereby, the petitioner has been relieved from the post of Project Officer, District Unnao Development Authority Sultanpur, and order dated 29 July 2020, whereby, the fourth respondent has been posted on the said post.
3. The facts, briefly stated, for the purposes of the present writ petition, is that petitioner came to be appointed in 1987 on the post of Junior Clerk in the Department of Animal Husbandry, Government of U.P. Pursuant to a requisition issued by the State Urban Development Agency on 21 June 2017, petitioner applied for appointment on deputation for the post of Project Officer. The requisition was followed by an advertisement dated 26 June 2017, published in daily
Ashok Kumar Ratilal Patel vs. Union of India
Union of India vs. V. Ramakrishnan and others
Balmer Lawrie and Company and others vs. Partha Sarathi Sen Roy and others
West Bengal State Electricity Board & others vs. Desh Bandhu Ghosh and others
Workmen vs. Hindustan Steel Ltd.
State of U.P. and others vs. Prem Lata Misra (Km) and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.