JUDGMENT :

Rajnish Kumar, J.

1. Heard, Shri Rakesh Kumar Singh & Shri Pramendra Kumar Singh, learned counsels for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for respondents no.1 and 2, Shri Gaurav Mehrotra, learned counsel for respondent no.3 and Shri Sameer Kalia, learned counsel appearing for respondents no.6, 8, 9 and 10. Shri Prafulla Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of some of the private respondents submitted that he has instructions not to appear and argue on their behalf.

2. By means of the instant writ petition, the petitioners have approached this Court challenging the select list dated 17.05.2016 issued by the Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Services Selection Commission (here-in-after referred as UPSSSC)/opposite party no.3, which has been issued after selection in pursuance of the advertisement no.14/15 dated 03.09.2015. A further prayer has been made for a direction to the opposite party no.3 for re-selection for the post of X-Ray Technician in accordance with law.

3. The brief facts of the case, as culled out from the pleadings on record, are that the opposite party no.3 issued the advertisement no.14/15 on 03.09.2015 for various posts including the post of X-Ray Tec