Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
SHREE PRAKASH SINGH
Ashish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
tate Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Higher Edu. Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Copy of the government order dated 03-11-2015 placed by Mr. Mahendra Pratap Singh and Mr. Shyama Charan Dixit, learned counsels for the respondent nos. 6 & 7, is taken on record.
2. Heard Mr. Abhinandan Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State, Mr. Jogendera Nath Verma, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2, Mr. Anurag Kumar Singh,learned counsel for the respondent no. 5, Mr. Mahendra Pratap Singh and Mr. Shyama Charan Dixit, learned counsels for the respondent nos. 6 & 7.
3. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the advertisement dated 30-12-2024, issued by the respondent no. 6 and further all the consequential appointments and selection process undertaken thereof, is also under challenge.
4. Contention put forth by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that after the Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Service Selection Commission Act, 2014(hereinafter referred to as "Act,2014"), is promulgated by the state legislature and the same came into effect since 20-06-2014, the selection in non government aided institutions should have been done by the Commission and not by any other authori
A candidate cannot challenge a selection process after participating and being unsuccessful; such claims are barred by the doctrine of estoppel.
Candidates participating in a recruitment process do not have a legal right to appointment if the selection process is found to be flawed and thus invalid.
The approval of maximum marks of the interview by the Government subsequent to the selection fulfilled the condition of Rule 8(1) of the Rules of 2015, and the selection was held in accordance with t....
Public recruitment processes must ensure fairness and legality, with allegations of irregularities requiring substantial proof to warrant judicial intervention.
The court established that recruitment processes must adhere to the legal framework in place at the time of vacancy and emphasized the necessity of public advertisement for fair selection.
Employment and Service matter - Grade-IV employees - Selection process - Selection process is not subject matter of challenge in absence of any grounds, subsequent action of issuing appointment order....
Point of Law : Selecting body does not have its right to alter the procedure for selection than what is prescribed under the relevant Service Rules, 2014 and Recruitment Rules, 2017.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
