JASPREET SINGH
Avadhesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate, Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. As we are celebrating 75 Years of our Independence which has been celebrated with much fanfare across the country under the aegis of "75 Years of Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsov", but at the same time, this Court is pained to take note of the instant petition whereby the petitioners have approached this Court alleging violation of their fundamental right to access justice.
2. Rule of law is meaningless unless there is access to justice for the common people. Access to justice is one of the constitutionally recognized human and fundamental right. Access to justice means to reach justice easily by legal proceedings in appropriate time. Delivery of justice should be impartial and non-discriminatory. State to take all necessary steps to provide fair, transparent, effective, and accountable service that promotes access to justice for all.
3. It is in the backdrop of Constitutional vision that the facts of the present case requires to be evaluated.
4. The petitioners have invoked the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Judicial), Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow to register their case
Access to justice is a fundamental right guaranteed under the Constitution of India, and the State has an obligation to ensure prompt registration of cases and fair adjudication in accordance with th....
State authorities must adhere to statutory timelines for adjudication to prevent denial of justice and ensure prompt legal redress.
The failure to notify a necessary party in land demarcation proceedings violates the principles of natural justice, necessitating a fresh examination of the case.
The principles of natural justice, including the right to a fair hearing, must be observed in administrative proceedings under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, particularly regarding orders affecting pro....
The court held that failure to provide notice and opportunity for hearing in demarcation proceedings violated natural justice, rendering the ex parte orders illegal and subject to procedural recall.
Judicial officers must uphold promptitude and integrity, as failure to register cases and comply with court orders constitutes dereliction of duty.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.