IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PRITINKER DIWAKER, ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, JJ.
Shailesh Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and another - Respondents
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No. 97 of 2019
Decided on : 21-03-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 372 – Land Revenue Act, 1901 – Section 234(3) –U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 – Section 234(3) – Whether constitutional validity of provisions of U.P Land Record Manual can be questioned in a writ petition styled as a Public Interest Litigation – Held, Court find that U.P. Land Record Manual merely provides manner and procedure to maintain land records Section 234(3) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 provides that Land Record Manual in force on date of commencement of Revenue Code, 2006, shall continue to remain in force, to extent they are not inconsistent with provisions of Revenue Code, 2006 until amended rescinded or repealed by any regulations made under this Section – Court are not inclined to entertain the petition styled as PIL particularly in view of fact that Section 234(3) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, itself takes care of inconsistency of Land Record Manual and upholds it only to extent it is not inconsistent with provisions of Revenue Code, 2006 – Court are of opinion that this is not a fit case where PIL jurisdiction should be invoked or exercised – Court dismiss.
JUDGMENT :
Ashutosh Srivastava, J.
This writ petition styled as a PIL has been filed for declaring the U.P. Land Record Manual as ultra-vires the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and the Revenue Code Rules, 2016. Although the prayer made in the writ (PIL) is not so specific but from the tenor of the petition it is borne out that the petitioner seeks the aforesaid relief. We however quote the reliefs claimed in the petition which are as under :
2. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to make new U.P. Land Record Manual as per provisions of the U.P. Revenue Code 2006 or amend Para ka-124 of U.P. Land Record Manual in accordance with the class of the tenure as defined in U.P. Revenue Code 2006.
3. Issue any other writ order or direction which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.''
2. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that he is a social worker and farmer and takes active part in the social work and espouses the cause of poor villagers and farmers and has no personal interest in filing the present PIL petition which is being filed for the benefit of the villagers and public at large. It is contended that the instant petition raises the issue for the general interest of the public as U.P. Land Record Manual is an old Manual and is not according to U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
3. Before dealing with the plea as raised in the writ PIL, it would be apposite to briefly state about the U.P. Land Record Manual and the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as also the Revenue Code Rules, 2016 framed thereunder.
4. The U.P. Land Record Manual is a collection of Rules framed under Section 234 of the Land Revenue Act, 1901 as well as instructions issued by the State Government in relation to various matters. Chapter -V of Part-I of the Manual relates to the map and Khasra, Chapter VIII deals with the Khatauni. The preface to the Manual shows that Chapters III to XI of Part-I of the Manual have been framed under Clause (d) of Section 234 of the Land Revenue Act, 1901. Thus the rules contained in Chapter V and VIII of the Manual are statutory Rules made under Section 234. Chapter-V dealing, inter alia, with Khasra consists of paras 55 to 102. Chapter VIII relates to Khatauni and consists of paras 121 to 160. Para 60 provides that Khasra shall be prepared in Form No. P-3. Form No. P-3 consists of 21 columns. Column-5 is meant for the name of the cultivator. In Column No. 6 are to be entered the names of sub-tenants or tenants of sir, or tenants of permanent tenure-holders, or rent free grantees, or grantees at a favourable rate of rent or occupier of land without the consent of the persons entitled to admit such sub-tenants. Column No. 21 is the remark column. Para 71 provides for the entry in Column No. 5. It is not only the name of the cultivator but also the ''nature of his rights' i.e. the class of his tenure and where necessary, the term of cultivation, have to be entered. These entries are to be made in accordance with paras 72 to 86, 124 and 124-A and 126 to 129 as the case may be. Paras 124 to 129 are in Chapter VIII dealing with Khatauni. In substance the U.P. Land Record Manual provides the rules and procedures for preparation and maintenance of Land Records.
5. The U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (U.P. Act No. 8 of 2012) has been promulgated to consolidate and amend the law relating to land tenures and land revenue in the State of Uttar Pradesh and to provide for matters connected therewith and incidental thereto. There were as many as 39 Acts relating to revenue law enforced in the State of U.P. Out of these Acts, the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 and the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, are the most prominent. The aforesaid Acts have been amalgamated in the U.P
Ashok Kumar Pandey v. State of West Bengal
BALCO Employees Union (Regd) v. Union of India and others
Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India and others
Charles Sobraj v. Supdt. Central Jail, Tihar, New Delhi
Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee and another v. C.K. Rajan and others
Hussainara Khatoon and others v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar
Janata Dal v. H.S. Chowdhary and others
People's Union for Democratic Rights and others v. Union of India
The court reinforced that statutory remedies must be exhausted before invoking the High Court's extraordinary jurisdiction in matters of land encroachment.
Point of Law : Courts must do justice by promotion of good faith, and prevent law from crafty invasions. Courts must maintain the social balance by interfering where necessary for the sake of justice....
Land Scam - 'Public Interest Litigation' – Not maintainable - PIL to be genuine Public Interest, not a publicity petition, politically motivated by third party, private interest or with any other mot....
Public Interest Litigation cannot be used to challenge valid judicial orders when adequate remedies are available, reaffirming adherence to procedural law in land exchange matters.
The court reinforced that administrative decisions must consider ongoing civil proceedings and legal injunctions, ensuring maintainability assessments align with established legal provisions.
A challenge to a long-standing notification under the Muslim Wakfs Act after an undue delay is impermissible, reinforcing the finality of administrative actions.
Provisions of the Act No.30 of 2013 cannot be clubbed with the APMRUDA Act, 2016 and the Rules, 2016.
The court established that restoration proceedings under the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 are valid despite the enactment of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, emphasizing jurisdictional competence and subs....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.