Back
SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, VIKAS BUDHWAR
Ganga Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Dinesh Rai, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Harish Kumar Srivastava, learned standing counsel for the State-respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:
II. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to promote the petitioners on the post of Naib Tehsildar in pursuance of the Rule 16 of the Ut
when a new post is created, the concept of Rules obtaining when the vacancies arose is inappiicable as what is created is a new post on account of re-structuring of the cadre.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to ensure gender equality and non-discrimination in promotion opportunities, as guaranteed by Articles 14, 15, and 16 of the Indian Consti....
The amendment affecting chances of promotion for employees does not necessarily constitute a change in the conditions of service, and the State has the power to unilaterally amend service rules.
The court affirmed the validity of the merger of Senior Supply Inspectors with Area Rationing Officers effective from 30.06.2011, ruling that executive orders cannot override statutory rules.
Seniority between direct recruits and promotees must follow the quota-rota rule under statutory provisions when applicable, regardless of past non-implementation, ensuring fairness in the same recrui....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
