IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SADHNA RANI THAKUR, J.
Sonu Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. And Another – Respondents
Application U/S 482 No.9911 of 2022
Decided on : 11-01-2023
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - NDPS Act - Section 8/21, Sections 52-A, 53, 60 and 63 – Criminal trial – Disposal of seized narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances - Applicants seek to invoke the inherent jurisdiction of this court to quash the order – Whether application is maintainable – Held, It is not yet proved that the vehicle was being used in the offence within the knowledge of the applicant - So in the opinion of the court, the vehicle of the applicant needs to be released in favour of the applicant during trial - Order of the trial court in not releasing the vehicle in favour of the applicant even after one year of is seizure is legally unsustainable – Application allowed.
JUDGMENT :
1. By moving this application under section 482 Cr.P.C. the applicants seek to invoke the inherent jurisdiction of this court to quash the order dated 24.3.2022 in criminal misc. case no. 44 of 2022, State Vs.Pawan Kumar and others, arising out of case crime no. 91 of 2021 under section 8/21 NDPS Act, police station Ghoorpur District Allahabad. A further prayer is made to release three wheeler vehicle no. UP-65-TD-9967 in favour of the applicant relating to the above mentioned case.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the FIR was lodged against six named accused persons under section 8/21 NDPS Act on 11.3.2021 with the allegation that in three wheeler vehicle no. U.P.-65-TD-9967 four accused persons Pawan, Kuldeep Kumar, Mohd. Nasir and Sonu @ Mohd. Hasim were apprehended by the police with 49 boxes, total 5807 bottles of onerex cc cough syrup, without any bill and voucher, being transported from New Vridhi Farma Saptnagar Madagin, Varanasi to M/s Shyam medical store Gauhaniya Riva Road Jasra Prayagraj.
4. It is argued that each bottle contained 10 ml. codine phosphate. The total codine phosphate quantity could be said to be 580.7 g. which is much less than the commercial quantity of 1 kg. The applicant was neither apprehended by the police on the spot in possession of any material relating to NDPS Act, nor the material was being supplied by him or it was for him. He is just the owner of the three wheeler no. U.P.-65-TD-9967 with all valid documents. He has been falsely implicated in the present case. He is an innocent, law abiding and peace loving person, having no criminal history. The applicant moved his release application before the trial court, which was dismissed vide order dated 24.3.2022.
5. His vehicle is parked at the premises of police station since 11.3.2021. He has complete documents of the vehicle. GST invoice and account statement of the syrup recovered are also annexed with the paper book. It is alleged by the police that no receipt was shown regarding the medicine recovered, whereas the police concerned did not consider the receipt of the medicines at the time of recovery.
6. Learned A.G.A. opposed the application and submitted that the bill placed before the court does not bear signature of any person. In the recovered syrup the quantity of codine was 580.7 kg. which is much higher than the permitted commercial quantity of 1 kg. The applicant is the vehicle owner, he is responsible for the things supplied in his vehicle, unless he proves otherwise. It is for him to establish prima facie that his vehicle was being used for transportation of the contraband substance without his knowledge.
7. From the perusal of the record, it is found that from three wheeler of the applicant, the police had recovered 5807 bottles, each bottle containing 100 ml. onerex cough syrup on the spot. The person on the three wheeler could not show the bill and voucher of this cough syrup. Each bottle of cough syrup contained 10 ml codine phosphate and thus, total 58.07 kg codine phosphate was found wherein its permissible commercial quantity is 1 kg. Admittedly, the applicant was not apprehended by the police on the spot. He is said to be the owner of the vehicle, wherein this contraband substance is said to have recovered. The prayer is made to release vehicle no. UP 65-TD-9967. His release application before the trial court is said to have been rejected on 24.3.2022.
8. The trial court found that as the contraband was recovered from the vehicle of the applicant, so it is the presumption that the applicant had the knowledge of transportation of this contraband substance, unless he proves otherwise. Admittedly, the driver of the three wheeler vehicle has been granted bail.
9. The provision regarding the release of the vehicle in NDPS Act 1985 are sections 52-A, 53, 60 and 63. Section 63 of NDPS Act runs as under :
There is no specific bar/restriction under provisions of NDPS Act for return of any seized vehicle used for transporting narcotic drug or psychotropic substance in interim, pending disposal of crimin....
The court ruled that a vehicle seized under the NDPS Act can be released on interim custody unless the owner is implicated in the unlawful use, affirming the application of Sections 451 and 457 of th....
Release of seized vehicle – Seized vehicles can be confiscated by trial court only on conclusion of trial when accused is convicted or acquitted or discharged – Seized vehicle is not liable to confis....
The NDPS Act allows for the interim release of a seized vehicle unless the owner is implicated, provided due process is followed.
A registered owner of a vehicle seized in connection with a narcotics offence, who is not an accused, is entitled to interim custody of the vehicle, subject to meeting certain conditions to ensure co....
The court established that the Special Court has the authority to grant interim custody of a vehicle seized under the NDPS Act if the owner proves lack of knowledge of its use for illegal activities.
Confiscation and release of vehicle – Decision regarding confiscation of any article can be taken only by Special Court and only after conviction, acquittal or discharge – There is no provision for p....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.