SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 197

VIVEK CHAUDHARY
Ker Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sujeet Kumar Rai
For the Respondent: Satyam Singh

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Satyam Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and 3 and learned standing counsel for State.

2. Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner claiming payment of arrears of his salary. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

3. Learned counsel for respondents have no objection to the same.

4. In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.3 Member/Secretary, District Administrative Committee, Farrukhabad/Assistant Commissioner & Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Farrukhabad raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of his claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order.

5. In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date a certi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top