DINESH KUMAR SINGH
Indra Pratap Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present three appeals under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. have been instituted against the common judgement and order dated 18.10.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge (MP/MLA)/Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.3, Faizabad in Special Case No.3012 of 2018 (State Vs. Phool Chandra Yadav and others), arising out of Case Crime No.24 of 1992, Police Station Ram Janam Bhumi, District Faizabad, whereby the learned trial court has convicted and sentenced the accused-appellants as under:-
U/s 468 I.P.C. five years imprisonment and fine of Rs.8,000/-each and in default of payment of fine, twenty days additional simple imprisonment.
U/s 471 I.P.C. two years imprisonment and fine of Rs.5,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, fifteen days additional simple imprisonment.
Facts:-
2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the Principal of K.S. Saket Postgraduate College, Faizabad, Sri Yaduvansh Ram Tripathi gave a complaint to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Faizabad on 16.2.1992 alleging that in his previous letter dated 1
Bhagat Ram v. Khatu Ram [AIR 1929 PC 110 : 116 IC 394
Muddasani Venkata Narasaiah (Dead) through Legal Representatives Vs. Muddasani Sarojana
Behari Prasad and others Vs. State of Bihar (1996) SCC (Cri) 271
R.V.E. Venkatachala Gounder Vs. Arulmigu Viswesaraswami and V.P. Temple and another
Bhoju Mandal v. Debnath Bhagat [Bhoju Mandal v. Debnath Bhagat
Roman Catholic Mission v. State of Madras [AIR 1966 SC 1457]
P.C. Purushotham Reddiar Vs. V.S. Perumal (1972) 1 SCC 9: AIR 1972 SC 608
Chuni Lal Dwarka Nath v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. Ltd.
Smt. Sudha Agarwal Vs. VIth Additional District Judge, Ghaziabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.