SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 634

KAUSHAL JAYENDRA THAKER
Ram Beti – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Chandra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : P.K. Saxena, S.C. Keserwani.
For the Respondents: S. Kumar, Sushil Kumar Mehrotra, Swapnil Kumar.

ORDER :

1. By way of this appeal, the appellants has challenged the judgment and order dated 12.12.1994/14.12.1994 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/IIIrd Additional District Judge, Etah (hereinafter referred to as ‘Tribunal’) in M.A.C.P. No. 115 of 1992 (Smt. Ram Beti and another Vs. Suresh Chandra and others) awarding a sum of Rs. 61,160/- as compensation to the claimants/appellants with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of filing the claim petition.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondents.

3. The brief facts of the case are that claimants-appellants filed a Motor Accident Claim Petition before the Tribunal for claiming the compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for the death of Ram Bilas in a road accident with the averments that on 13.1.1991, Ram Bilas-deceased was going to his village from village Ambari on his bicycle. When he reached at village Kathauli, a scooter no. U.P. 82 2296, which was being driven very rashly and negligently by its driver. The aforesaid scooter being driven in such a manner dashed d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top