JUDGMENT :

SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

1. Brief facts of present case, as culled out from writ petition, are that, Chairman, Land Management Committee issued an Asami Patta of certain land in Village Rakhukhore, Post Kampierganj, Tappa Panchwara, Pargana Haweli, District Gorakhpur in favour of father of petitioner on 30.06.1971 on yearly rent. Accordingly his name was recorded in relevant Khatauni also. There is no averment in writ petition, whether above referred Patta was extended year by year or it was cancelled and whether after death of petitioner’s father (date of death is not mentioned), he continued in possession being Pattedar.

2. After a period of more than about 37 years the present petitioner filed an application under Section 9-A(2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 1953”) with prayer that he may be declared as Bhumidhar with transferable right of land in question in terms of provisions of Section 122-B (4-F) of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 1950”).

3. Consolidation Officer, Kampierganj, District Gorakhpur vide order dated 11.04.2016 in Case No. 415 (Feku vs. State of U.P.) rejected claim of petitioner and dismissed above referred application. Relevant part of said order is mentioned hereafter:

^^eSaus oknh ds rjQ ls ÁLrqr rdksZ dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk lE;d voyksdu fd;kA [kkrk la[;k 616 esa vafdr xkVs cUnkscLr esa xzke lHkk dh cpr Hkwfe Js.kh&6 rFkk catj Js.kh 5 ds [kkrs esa vafdr jgk gSA Lo;a oknh }kjk Hkh mDr rF; dh LohdjksfDr dh x;h gS] fd Á'uxr [kkrs 1378 Qlyh ds [krkSuh [kkrk la[;k 709 esa xzke lHkk dh cpr Hkwfe rFkk catj Hkwfe ds esa ntZ jgk gSA tgka rd ijxukf/kdkjh egksn; ds vkns'k fnukad 26-03-1999 }kjk iV~Vk Lohd`r djus dk mYys[k fd;k x;k gS rks mlls Hkh Li"V gS fd Á'uxr vkjkth dk ;fn dksbZ iV~Vk gqvk Hkh gS rks og lky nj lky dk gqvkA rnuqlkj Js.kh&3 esa vafdr gqvk vkSj vf/kfu;e esa nh x;h O;oLFkkvksa ds lkis{k esa ,slk iV~Vk 5 o"kZ okn Loeso lekIr gks tk;sxkA fcuk fdlh vkSipkfjd vkns'k ds gh ,sls esa ;fn Js.kh&3 dk bUækt vHkh rd pyk vk jgk rks og =qfViw.kZ gS vkSj Js.kh&3 ds bUækt ds vk/kkj ij ,slh Hkwfe ij laØe.kh; Hkwfe/kj ;kuh Js.kh&1 dk LoRo ugha fn;k ldrk cfYd ,slk bUækt fujLr gksxkA rRØe esa eSa bl fu"d"kZ ij igqaprk gaw fd vk/kkj o"kZ [krkSuh ds [kkrk la[;k 616 esa vafdr xkVksa ij oknh dk Js.kh&3 esa vafdr bUækt fujLr djds iwoZor xzke lHkk ds cpr Hkwfe rFkk catj [kkrs esa vafdr fd;k tkuk mfpr gksxkA**

4. Petitioner being aggrieved by above referred order, preferred appeal under Section 11-A of Act, 1953 before Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Gorakhpur, however, the same was dismissed by order dated 28.03.2017 and relevant part of order is reproduced as under:

^^eSaus vihydrkZ ds vf/koDrk ds rdksZ rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA lgk;d pdcUnh vf/kdkjh dh vk[;k fnukad 26-12-2014 ls Li"V gS fd fookfnr Hkwfe xkVk la[;k 87 vkfn [kkrk 616 esa ntZ gS vkSj ;g Js.kh&3 ds vUrxZr [kkrk gSA pdcUnh vf/kdkjh us vihydrkZ dks lquk gS rFkk ;g fy[kk gS fd iV~Vk gqvk Hkh gS rks og lky nj lky dk gqvk gSA fookfnr Hkwfe Js.kh 3 esa vafdr gS vkSj Js.kh 3 ds bUækt dks dk;e ugha j[kk tk ldrk gSA pdcUnh vf/kdkjh }kjk fookfnr Hkwfe dks Js.kh 3 ls [kkfjt djds xzke lHkk dh Hkwfe ntZ fd;k x;k gSA i=koyh ds voyksdu ls Li"V gS fd fookfnr Hkwfe oxZ 3 ntZ jgh gSA bl Ádkj ds pdcUnh vf/kdkjh dk vkns'k U;k;ksfpr gS ftlesa fdlh Ádkj ds gLr{ksi dh vko';drk ugha gSA**

5. Petitioner being aggrieved by above referred two orders, filed revision under Section 48(3) of Act, 1953 before Deputy Director of Consolidation, Gorakhpur. Petitioner’s revision was also dismissed by order dated 24.07.2018 and relevant part of order is mentioned hereinafter:

^^eSaus fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk lE;d voyksdu fd;kA cUnkscLr vf/kdkjh pdcUnh us vius vkns'k fnukad 28-03-2017 }kjk ;g foospuk fd;k gS fd lgk;d pdcUnh vf/kdkjh dh vk[;k fnukad 26-12-2014 ls Li"V gS fd fookfnr Hkwfe xkVk la[;k 87 vkfn [kkrk la[;k 616 esa ntZ gS vkSj ;