SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 671

IRSHAD ALI
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: A.P. Singh, Amarendra Pratap Singh.

JUDGMENT :

IRSHAD ALI, J.

1. Heard Sri A.P. Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Amarendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional C.S.C. for the respondent-State.

2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 03.09.2009, contained as Annexure-1 to the writ petition with a further prayer for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents, particularly, respondent No. 2 to consider afresh and appoint the petitioner on the post of Collection Peon under 50% quota by counting the service rendered by him as Seasonal Collection Peon in Tehsil Malihabad, District Lucknow from the due date with all benefits of service.

3. Brief facts giving rise to the present writ petition are as under:

S. No.

Relevant Facts of the Case

(a)

The petitioner was engaged as Seasonal Collection Peon in Tehsil Malihabad, District Lucknow on 11.02.1991.

(b)

In the year 1995, a new Te

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top