Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Ignoring Court-Mandated PWD Safety Report Invalidates Municipal Order: J&K&L High Court
06 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Reserves Verdict in Raju Tampering Conviction Plea
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA
Ramesh Chandra Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Central Bank Of India – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri O.P. Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Ramesh Chandra Pandey, the petitioner in person, who is a practising lawyer of this Court since long, along with Shri Om Subhash Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Abhishek Tandon, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent-Bank.
2. By order dated 26.09.2022, the Apex Court made a request from this Court to take up this writ petition at an early date and conclude the proceedings as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of order. The period of six months has already expired in March, 2023.
3. The matter has been placed before me for the first time.
4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties at length on 21.07.2023, the judgment was reserved.
5. This writ petition has been filed challen
The court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in disciplinary proceedings, highlighting the discretionary power of the disciplinary authority to impose appropriate punishment and the impo....
Bank officials accused of serious financial misconduct are expected to discharge their duties with utmost integrity and honesty, and the punishment imposed by the Disciplinary Authority cannot be sub....
Bank employees must maintain high standards of integrity; misconduct leading to loss of confidence justifies disciplinary penalties.
The judgment emphasizes the limited scope of interference in departmental proceedings under Articles 226 and 227 and the importance of justifying the penalty imposed.
The court established that in disciplinary proceedings, the principles of natural justice must be followed, but the court's role is limited to ensuring procedural fairness rather than re-evaluating t....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article