SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 1122

J. J. MUNIR
Vinod – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : N.K. Maurya, Rajesh Singh, S.K. Maurya
For the Respondent: S.K. Gupta

JUDGMENT :

1. In this case, notice was issued on 07.01.2020, granting time to the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2 and to Mr. S.K. Gupta, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 3 to 8 to file counter affidavits. No counter affidavit has been filed either on behalf of the State or on behalf of respondent nos. 3 to 8. This Court vide order dated 07.01.2020 has condoned the latches in filing the petition.

2. Admit.

3. Heard forthwith.

4. Heard Mr. Rajesh Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Girijesh Kumar Tripathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2.

5. No one appears on behalf of respondent nos. 3 to 8.

6. This writ petition is directed against an order dated 15.10.2005 passed by the Nagar Ayukt, Nagar Nigam, Allahabad dismissing the petitioner, a Safai Karmchari from service. This order has been upheld in appeal by the Commissioner, Allahabad Division, Allahabad vide order dated 12.03.2007. Both these orders are impugned in the present writ petition.

7. The petitioner's case is that he was appointed as a Safai Karmchari with the Nagar Nigam, Allahabad by the Nagar Ayukt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top