Ishtiyak vs State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 1421

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 1421

K. J. THAKER, UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Ishtiyak – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sufiya Bano, Anil Kumar, Apul Misra, Ashok Kumar Singh, Aushim Luthra, Mohd Akhtar, Hemant Kumar Singh, Rajrshi Gupta,
For the Respondent: G.A., Avadhesh Singh,Ramesh Chandra Gupta-II

Table of Content
1. details of the appeals and convictions (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6)
2. factual background of the criminal case (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. witness testimonies corroborate the incident (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. assessment of motive and mens rea (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
5. common object and participation in unlawful assembly (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63)
6. final ruling and order of conviction (Para 105 , 106)

JUDGMENT :

Umesh Chandra Sharma, J.

1. Heard Sri Apul Misra, learned counsel for all the accused-appellants, Sri Vikas Goswami, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

2. Criminal Appeal No.2916 of 2018 has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 04.04.2018 passed in ST No.642 of 1996 (State of UP Vs. Allau and others) arising out of Case Crime No.121 of 1996, by Sri Santosh Kumar Tiwari, Additional Sessions Judge-II, Azamgarh by which the trial court convicted the accused persons namely Allau under Section 148 IPC for fine of Rs.3,000/-, under Section 302 IPC for life imprisonment and fine of Rs.25,000/-, under Section 307 /149 IPC for five

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(All) 1421

K. J. THAKER, UMESH CHANDRA SHARMAIshtiyak – AppellantVersusState of U. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (40)

K. J. THAKER, UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Ishtiyak – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent