SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 1539

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Sangam Verma - Applicant
Versus
State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko - Opposite Party
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 13299 of 2023
Decided On : 08-11-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant : Arvind Kumar, Ajay Deep Verma.

The court considered the principle of parity in granting bail to the applicant, taking into account the bail granted to other co-accused persons in similar circumstances.

Headnote:

Bail - Criminal Law - The court granted bail to the applicant, who was one of the Directors of the Company, in a case involving allegations of non-refund of invested amounts. The court considered the fact that six co-accused persons working in the company had already been granted bail, and the applicant had been in jail for a significant period.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant sought bail in a case involving allegations of non-refund of invested amounts in a cooperative society.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the applicant, being one of the Directors of the Company, was entitled to be released on bail, especially considering that six co-accused persons working in the company had already been granted bail.

Issues: Bail application in a case under sections 420, 409, 504, 506, I.P.C.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the applicant's role as a Director of the Company and the fact that other co-accused persons had already been granted bail, leading to the decision to grant bail to the applicant.

Final Decision: The bail application was allowed, and the applicant was ordered to be released on bail with specific conditions.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned Addl. Government Advocate, and perused the record.

2. By means of the instant application the applicant seeks bail in F.I.R. No.731 of 2022, under sections 420, 409, 504, 506, I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Barabanki.

3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of a First Information Report lodged on 23.07.2022 against 6 named persons, including the applicant, alleging that the informant used to work as an Agent in M/s Lifelong Care Multi State Agro Cooperative Society Ltd. and he had invested some amount of his own and had got huge sums of money invested by other persons aggregating to Rs.50,78,961/-.

4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. In para 14 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application the applicant's involvement in 59 other cases has been shown, all of which relate to the allegations of non-refund of amount invested in the aforesaid company, in 11 of which he has been granted bail. It has also been submitted

5. The Learned counsel for the applicant states that one of the co-accused Abhishek Upadhyay, who is said to be the Branch Head of the Company's Branch Office, has been granted bail by this Court by means of an order dated 29.05.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2446 of 2023. Another co-accused Dinesh Kumar Yadav, who is alleged to be an employee of the company, has also been granted bail by means of an order dated 17.07.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 8928 of 2023.Co-accused Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Kumar Verma has also been enlarged on bail by this Court by means of order dated 25.07.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9325 of 2023. The co-accused Ajeet Kumar, who used to work as an agent in the Cooperative Society has also been enlarged on bail by this court by means of an order dated 02.08.2023, passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9728 of 2023. A co-accused Atul Kumar Verma has also been granted bail in the present case by this court by means of an order dated 12.10.2023, passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.12173 of 2023.

6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has been implicated in the present case because he is one of the Directors of the Company and that six co-accused persons who are said to be working in the company, have already been granted bail, whereas the applicant is in jail since 06.08.2022, I am of the view that the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail.

7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

8. Let the applicant-Sangam Verma be released on bail in the aforesaid Case Crime No. 731 of 2022, under sections 420, 409, 504, 506, I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Barabanki, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

    (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top