SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1921

SAURABH LAVANIA
Ziledar – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director of Consolidation Bahraich – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ghulam Mohammad Kamil
For the Respondent: C.S.C.,Afzal Hasan

JUDGMENT

Saurabh Lavania, J.

Supplementary affidavit filed in the Court today is taken on record.

2. Heard Sri Ghulam Mohammad Kamil, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the State.

3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought the following main reliefs:-

    "i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 27.12.2023 passed by the D.D.C. Bahraich (opposite party No. 1) in Revision No. 521/202354081500000435 (Faujdar v. Ziledar and others). as contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition.

    ii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 19.10.2022 passed by the Consolidation Officer (opposite party No.2), as contained in Annexure No.2 to this writ petition.

    iii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No.3 not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioner over Gata No. 1765 from South East corner, situated at Village Gulra, Pargana Ikauna, Tehsil Payagpur, District Bahraich, on the basis of the impugned order dated 27.12.2023 and 19.10.2022 passed by the opposite parti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top