JUDGMENT :

Heard Sri Vijay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Muktesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 to 5 and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. This criminal revision has been filed against the order dated 07.12.2022 passed by Additional Sessions Judge-IVth, Jaunpur in Sessions Trial No. 320 of 2012, State Vs. Indrasen & others.

3. By the impugned order, the learned Additional Sessions Judge has rejected 43-[k application filed by the revisionist u/s 319 Cr.P.C. for summoning opposite party nos. 2 to 5 as additional accused for trial.

4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the revisionists that without considering the evidence on record, the trial court has rejected the revisionist’s application u/s 319 Cr.P.C. It has also been submitted that on the basis of complaint dated 09.08.2010, N.C.R. No. 120 of 2010 u/s 323, 504 I.P.C. was lodged against accused, Indrasen s/o Ram Yash, Rana Pratap s/o Ram Yash, Praveen alias Mulayam s/o Indrasen and Anil Kumar s/o Rajendra. The revisionist/informant on 16.09.2010 submitted application u/s 155 (2) Cr.P.C. in which he mentioned the name of four other accused, namely, Akhand Yadav, Chandrabh