IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Kshitij Shailendra, J.
Smt Nikita @ Najrana and Another – Petitioner
Versus
State of UP and Others – Respondents
Writ - C No. - 1348 of 2024
Decided On : 30-01-2024
Unlawful Conversion - Marriage and Religion - [UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, Sections 3, 6, 8, 9] - The court discussed the provisions of the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, focusing on the prohibition of conversion from one religion to another, the requirements for a valid conversion, and the effect of marriage performed for the sole purpose of unlawful conversion. The court emphasized the significance of compliance with Sections 8 and 9 for marriages involving individuals from different religions and highlighted the need for adherence to the Act's provisions for a valid conversion and its effect.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to provide security and restrain interference in their peaceful living as a married couple. The respondents pointed out the applicability of the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, due to the petitioners' inter-religious marriage.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the petitioners must ensure compliance with Sections 8 and 9 of the Act for their marriage to be valid, and disposed of the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after ensuring such compliance.
Issues: Applicability of the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 to the petitioners' inter-religious marriage and the requirement for compliance with Sections 8 and 9 of the Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for adherence to the Act's provisions for a valid conversion and its effect, particularly in the context of inter-religious marriages, and highlighted the significance of compliance with Sections 8 and 9 for such marriages.
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition after ensuring compliance with Sections 8 and 9 of the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners and Yogesh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents 2 and 3 to provide adequate security to petitioners and further restraining the respondents from causing any interference in peaceful living of petitioners as husband and wife.
3. Learned Standing Counsel points out that petitioner No.1 earlier belonged to Muslim religion and the petitioner No.2 belongs to Hindu religion and in view of the provisions of the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, unless compliance of the provisions of Sections 8 and 9 is made by the parties belonging to different religions, no sanctity/validity can be attached to such marriage.
4. The Act of 2021 was enacted with the following object:
5. Section 3 of the Act prohibits conversion from one religion to another religion by misrepresentation, force, fraud, undue influence, coercion or allurement. For the purpose of the present case, Explanation attached to sub-section (1) of Section 3 has significance and, therefore, the provision is being reproduced for a ready reference:
Explanation.-For the purposes of this sub-section conversion by solemnization of marriage or relationship in the nature of marriage on account of factors enumerated in this sub-section shall be deemed included."
6. Section 6 of the Act renders a marriage performed for the sole purpose of unlawful conversion or vice-versa as void, however, the proviso attached to the said section speaks of applicability of the provisions of Sections 8 and 9 as regards such marriages. For the convenience sake, Section 6 is extracted as under:
Provided that all the provisions of Section 8 and 9 shall apply for such marriages to be solemnized."
7. From the scheme of the Act of 2021, conversion from one religion to another is not impermissible. Rather, Sections 8 and 9 of the Act deal with the provisions for a valid conversion and its effect. For a ready reference, Sections 8 and 9 of the Act, 2021 are extracted as under:
(2) The religious convertor, who performs conversion ceremony for convert
Anwar Hasan Khan Vs. Mohd. Shafi & Ors. (2001) 8 SCC 540
Babaji Kondaji v. Nasik Merchants Co-op Bank Ltd. (1984) 2 SCC 50
Central India Spinning and Weaving Manufacturing Comp. versus Municipal Committee, Wardha
Eera (through Dr. Manjula Krippendorf) v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
Girdhari Lal & Sons versus Balbir Nath Mathur; 1986(2) SCC 237
Govindlal V Agricultural Produce Market Committee
N. K. Jain v. C. K. Shah (1991) 2 SCC 495: AIR 1991 SC1289
Prakash Kumar Alias Prakash Bhutto Vs. State of Gujarat
Reserve Bank of India v. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd.
Reserve Bank of India Vs. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. & Ors. (1987) 1 SCC 424
S. Gopal Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Som Prakash Rekhi v. Union of India (1981) 1 SCC 449
State Bank of Travancore v. Mohd. M. Khan
Swedish Match AB & Anr. Securities & Exchange Board, India & Anr.
Union of India & Ors. Vs. Filip Tiago De Gama of Vedem Vasco De Gama
Compliance with the provisions of the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, particularly Sections 8 and 9, is essential for the validity of inter-religious marriages.
The court ruled that a live-in relationship cannot be protected under law if one party is a minor at its inception and no application for conversion has been filed as mandated by the Uttar Pradesh Pr....
Point of Law : Any person of any religion who performs any act of conversion to another religion would fall within the ambit of ‘religion convertor’, and such conversion not performed in accordance w....
It is surely a calculative move on the part of the respondent no.4 who has attempted to overreach the process of law. It is utmost necessary for the officer concerned to check tendency and attempt, a....
Compliance with the U.P. Prevention of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act and evidence of a domestic relationship are crucial factors in seeking protection for interfaith live-in relationships.
The term 'any aggrieved person' in the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act includes law enforcement officers, allowing them to register FIRs to maintain public order.
The right to live together in an interfaith relationship is protected under Article 21 of the Constitution, guarding personal liberty against familial and societal coercion.
Conduct demonstrating conversion can suffice for invoking Hindu Marriage Act provisions even without formal ceremonies.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.