SANGEETA CHANDRA
Ram Autar Khandelwal – Appellant
Versus
Addl. District and Session Judge Lucknow – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for Revisionist and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent, Mr. Umesh Kumar Tiwari at length.
2. This Civil Revision has been filed against the judgment and order dated 08.10.2020 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Court No. 19, Lucknow in SCC No. 30 of 2017, 'Ajay Kumar Agarwal Vs. Ram Autar Khandelwal' with a delay of around one month. Although time was granted earlier to the counsel for the contesting respondents to file objections but he has not filed objections.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 says that he does not propose to file any objection and the matter be heard on merits.
4. Delay is condoned.
5. Office is directed to give a Regular number to this Revision.
6. It is the case of the Revisionist that the respondent landlord had given a shop on monthly rent of Rs.5,500/- to the Revisionist in 2008. Since then the Revisionist has been paying advance rent continuously either through cash or cheque on demand of the landlord as mutually and orally agreed upon by them. It has been alleged that the respondent’s son had asked the Revisionist for Rupees Two Lakhs for opening a new business, but the Re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.