SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 1755

KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA
Mohd. Yasin – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Manu Saxena

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Manu Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. The matter arises out of the proceedings under Indian Stamp Act, 1899. By the first order impugned dated 24.11.2016, a deficiency of Rs.14,11,960/-towards alleged deficient stamp duty has been levied upon the petitioner in the proceedings under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act along with penalty of the same amount with interest at the rate of 1.5% per month. By the second order impugned dated 28.9.2017, the statutory appeal by the petitioner under Section 56(1-A) of the Stamp Act has been dismissed.

3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner purchased a land covered by Gata No.552(Kha) situated at Village Bijauriya alias Nawabganj, Tehsil Nawabganj, District Bareilly from some Mirazul and Jabir Hussain @ Jakir Hussain and others by registered sale deed dated 20.4.2016. It is contended that the user of the land was agricultural in nature, however, in the revenue records, in the year 2008, it was recorded as non agricultural for some reason.

4. It is further contended that sellers moved an application dated 29.12.2015 u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top