SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1125

PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Mohammad Aqeel – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Islam Ahmad, Ram Lakhan Kashyap, Shivanshu Kashyap.

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned ACSC for the State respondents.

2. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 04.08.2021 passed by the Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh at Allahabad in Stamp Appeal No. 886/2014-15 as well as the impugned order dated 06.01.2014 passed by the Assistant Commissioner (Stamps) in Case No. 1360/stamp/2011/1581 under section 47-A(3) of the Indian Stamp Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the land in dispute is recorded as agricultural land. On 31.01.2011, a sale deed was executed after paying requisite stamp duty. On 17.02.2011, the Sub Registrar submitted a report stating therein that the land in dispute is a residential land and the stamp duty is payable accordingly. On the basis of the said report, proceedings under section 47-A(3) of the Stamp Act were initiated against the petitioner, which was transferred to the Assistant Commissioner (Stamp) (Second), Lucknow for disposal. On 13.10.2011, the petitioner filed objection. On 06.01.2014, the respondent no. 3 passed the impugned order holding the disputed plot as residential land and accordingl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top