SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH
Surendra Varenyam – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Aligarh Division – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Triveni Shanker, Ajay Shankar

JUDGMENT :

1. Sri Triveni Shankar, assisted by Sri Ajay Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sanjay Goswami, learned Addditional Chief Standing Counsel for the Revenue.

2. Present writ petition has been filed to assail the order dated 8.9.2021 passed by the Commissioner, Aligarh Division, Aligarh in Case No.00210 of 2020 (M/s Surendra Varenyam vs. State of U.P.). That appeal filed under Section 56(1A) Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') has been dismissed. Thus, the order passed under Section 47A of 'the Act' dated 6.3.2020 passed by Additional District Judge (Finance and Revenue), Etah has been affirmed.

3. By the subject deed dated 7.12.2018 the petitioner purchased 0.647 hectares and 0.040 hectares in Plot No.1058 ad measuring 0.405 hectare and half share of Plot No.1058 (Sa) ad measuring 0.680 hectares. The petitioner valued the deed at Rs.16,25,000/-and paid stamp duty of Rs.1,20,000/-.

4. Upon a complaint, the matter was referred for valuation of the deed and computation of stamp duty. In those proceedings it was found that the total area of Plot No.1058 was 0.405 hectares and that plot no.1058 (Sa) was 0.680 hectares. Also there pre-exist

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top