Kanpur Electric Supply Administration VS State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Kanpur Electric Supply Administration – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Arvind Kumar, Anubhav Singh, Usha Kiran.
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Prabhakar Awasthi.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Ms. Usha Kiran, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned counsel for the respondents workmen.

2. The present writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India assails the reference made to the Labour Court-I, Kanpur and being registered as Adjudication Case No.46 of 1994 and the award dated 20/25.07.1995, received on 30.08.1995.

3. Petitioners before this Court are the electricity department, supplying the electricity within the district Kanpur. Respondent no. 4 was engaged as a Trade Apprentice in the trade of Clerk (General) for one year w.e.f. 01.07.1983 to 31.06.1984. Respondent no. 5 was engaged as Trade Apprentice in the trade of Clerk (Commercial) for a period 19.10.1984 to 18.10.1985, under the Apprenticeship Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as the ‘Act of 1961’). An industrial dispute was raised on behalf of respondent nos. 4 and 5 through respondent no. 3 U.P. Bijli Karmchari Sangh.

4. The State Government referred the matter exercising power under Section 4 (k) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred as the ‘Act of 1947’) to the Labour Court, Kanpur as to whether the termination of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

ROHIT RANJAN AGARWALKanpur Electric Supply Administration – AppellantVersusState of U. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Kanpur Electric Supply Administration – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent