KRISHAN PAHAL
Ravindra Singh Rathaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL
1. Heard Sri Sandeep Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Amit Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
2. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 63 of 2024, under Sections 328, 376, 323, 344, 354-C, 384, 504, 506 of I.P.C., Police Station -Dadri, District -Gautam Buddha Nagar, during the pendency of trial.
Prosecution Story:
3. The applicant is stated to have entered into corporeal relationship with the informant and had even performed fake marriage with her in the year 2022. The applicant is also stated to have concealed the fact that he already had two siblings from his first marriage.
4. It is alleged that the informant had earlier instituted the FIR No.474 of 2022, u/s 366 of IPC against him in which police filed a closure report on account of her own statement recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C. The applicant is stated to have rendered the informant intoxicated and thereafter her statement has been recorded by the Magistrate. The applicant is even stated to have filed a habeas corpus Writ Petition No. 517 of 2023 before this Court although the same was dismissed.
5. The applicant had threatened the informant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.