KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA
Laxminiya – Appellant
Versus
Deena Nath – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra, J.
1. Heard Shri H.N. Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Raghvendra Shankar Srivastava for the appellant and Shri Tripathi B.G. Bhai, learned counsel for the contesting respondents.
2. The instant second appeal has been filed by the defendants-appellants of Original Suit No. 132 of 1979 challenging the judgment and decree dated 11.10.1984, whereby the learned Special Judge, Ghazipur has set aside the trial court’s judgment dismissing the suit and has, consequently, granted a decree in favour of the plaintiff-respondent permanently restraining the defendants-appellants from causing interference in the possession of the plaintiff over the disputed portion of the land.
3. During the course of hearing, the Court found that narration of facts contained in the judgments of the trial court and the first Appellate Court, when compared to the original pleadings, was found lacking and, therefore, the Court is narrating the relevant facts after perusing the original record.
4. Since shares of the respective parties, their entitlement and divestment is the issue directly involved in the present case, it is necessary to draw a family tree of one Tha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.