SHEKHAR B. SARAF
Vinod Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Hon’ble Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) :
1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by Vinod Kumar Jain (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Petitioner’) assailing the order dated December 7, 2006 passed by the District Magistrate/Collector, Jhansi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Respondent No. 2’).
FACTS
2. The facts giving rise to the instant writ petition are delineated below:
b. The name of the Petitioner was recorded in revenue records as bhumidhar with transferable rights.
c. After a period of three years from the date of execution of the sale deed, the Petitioner was served with a show cause notice dated January 7, 2005 which was based on an alleged inspection report dated December 4, 2004.
d. On the date fixed, that is on June 26, 2006, the authority concerned proceeded with the matter ex parte and passed an order on the same day imposing deficiency of stamp, penalty along with interest on the Petitioner. The Petitioner submitted an application on the same day before the authority concerned in or
Smt. Pushpa Sareen v. State of U.P. reported in (2015) 0 Supreme(All) 132
Mrs. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and another reported in (1978) 1 SCC 248
State of Kerala v. K.T. Shaduli Grocery Dealer Etc. reported in (1977) 2 SCC 777
Dharampal Satyapal Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise
State Bank of India and others v. Rajesh Agarwal and others reported in (2023) 6 SCC 1.
The principles of natural justice, particularly the right to be heard, are fundamental in administrative proceedings, especially when imposing financial liabilities such as additional stamp duty. The....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of the principles of natural justice, particularly audi alteram partem, in ensuring a fair and reasonable opportunity of hearing b....
Procedural non-compliance in property valuation hearings renders resulting orders invalid, necessitating fresh proceedings to ensure parties are duly notified and allowed to participate.
Natural justice principles require a fair hearing before any order with civil consequences is made, as established in several Supreme Court decisions.
The principles of natural justice, including the right to a fair hearing, must be observed in administrative proceedings under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, particularly regarding orders affecting pro....
The Collector must follow due process and provide notice before determining stamp duty; reliance on ex-parte inspections without evidence contravenes procedural laws.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of statutory rules in property valuation under the Indian Stamp Act, particularly the requirement for prior notice before insp....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.