SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 1868

MANISH MATHUR
Umesh Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner Stamp Lko. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M.M.Srivastava

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Upmanyu Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.

2. Both the petitions have been filed against order dated 07.02.2008 passed under Section 47A/33 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1899) whereby instrument of transfer of the property concerned has been found to be undervalued and, therefore, appropriate valuation along with penalty and interest has been imposed upon petitioners.

3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that so far as WRIT -C No. -1001426 of 2008 is concerned, the impugned order has been passed on an exparte basis without any notice to petitioner, Dr. Umesh Kumar Singh. It is submitted that although impugned order indicates notice having been issued to opposite parties but in fact notices were issued in other connected matters and not in the present case and since impugned order has been passed on ex parte basis, the same has been directly assailed in proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without taking recourse to appellate proceedings under Section 56 of the Act of 1899. It is further submitted that this Court vide order dated 12.10.2022

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top