SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 827

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh, J.
Mrs. Ameena Jung And Anr. - Revisionist
Versus
Faridi Waqf Thru. Mutwalli Mrs. Anush Faridi Khan And Ors. - Opposite Party
Civil Revision No. - 22 of 2022
Decided On : 21-05-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Revisionist : Subhash Vidyarthi, Dhruv Mathur, Saud Rais
For the Opposite Party : Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi, Farhan Habib, Pranav Agarwal, Pritish Kumar, Shantanu Gupta, Syed Aftab Ahmad

The court ruled that beneficiaries must be included in Waqf proceedings, emphasizing the necessity of their presence for effective adjudication of property rights.

Headnote:(A) Waqf Act, 1995 - Section 83(9) - Revision against order of Waqf Tribunal - Properties de-listed from Waqf register - Revisionists, as beneficiaries, not impleaded in proceedings - Court held their presence necessary for effective adjudication - Tribunal's order set aside for fresh consideration. (Paras 1, 56, 58)

(B) Waqf Properties - Definition and conditions for dedication - Properties acquired from sale proceeds of Waqf property treated as Waqf - Leasehold properties cannot be dedicated as Waqf if lease expired. (Paras 28, 56)

Facts of the case:
The revision was filed against the Waqf Tribunal's order allowing the de-listing of properties from the Waqf register, which were claimed to be Waqf properties by the revisionists, who were beneficiaries but not parties in the original proceedings. (Paras 1, 14)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the revisionists were necessary parties and should have been included in the proceedings before the Waqf Tribunal, which affected the legality of the order passed. (Paras 56, 58)

Issues: Whether the revisionists were necessary parties to the proceedings and whether the leasehold properties could be treated as Waqf properties. (Paras 36, 56)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of including all necessary parties in proceedings affecting their rights, particularly in cases involving Waqf properties and the obligations of a mutawalli. (Paras 56, 58)

Result: Revision allowed; order of Waqf Tribunal set aside and matter remanded for fresh consideration.

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - Beneficiaries who are necessary parties must be impleaded in Waqf proceedings for effective adjudication of property rights (!) (!) . - Leasehold properties cannot be treated as Waqf properties if the lease has expired, as they lack the necessary permanent dedication (!) (!) . - An order obtained by fraud or collusion vitiates the proceedings and can be set aside, even through revisionary mechanisms (!) (!) .

What are the rights of beneficiaries in Waqf proceedings when properties are sought to be de-listed from the Waqf register?

What is the proper approach regarding leasehold properties and their eligibility to be treated as Waqf properties?

What is the scope of judicial review when an order is challenged under Section 83(9) of the Waqf Act?


JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh, J.

1. The instant revision has been preferred under Section 83 (9) of the Waqf Act, 1995 being aggrieved by the order dated 04.07.2018 passed by the Uttar Pradesh Waqf Tribunal in Waqf Case no. 37 of 2018, as a consequence, several properties belonging to Waqf No. 42-A, Lucknow have been de-listed from the register of Waqf.

2. In order to appreciate the controversy involved in the instant revision, certain facts giving rise to the instant revision are being noted hereinafter:-

3. Dr. Mohd. Abdul Jalil Faridi and his brother Lt. Mohd. Rafey Faridi both sons of Late Khan Bahadur Maulvi Mohammad Abdul Haq Saheb created a Walf-Alal-Nafs and Alal-Aulad to be (known as Waqf Faridi) by a Waqf deed dated 09.11.1945 and two properties were dedicated to the Waqf Faridi; (i) House No. 91, Dr. Moti Lal Bose Road, Machli Mohal, P.S. Hazratgarnj, Lucknow (ii) Faridi Building situated on Nazool Plot No. 14 near Maqbara Amzad Ali Shah, Hazratganj, Lucknow.

4. Dr. Mohd. Abdul Jalil Faridi was the first mutawalli of the Waqf and the waqf deed provided that the income of the waqf would be shared amongst the wakifs from generation to generation in equal amounts. The Waqf deed further stipulated that the income from any of the properties if was less than the amount required for its upkeep and other necessary expenses then the same could be sold to purchase a better property subject to the condition that on the purchase of the new property, the same would also be dedicated to the Waqf.

5. At this stage, it will be relevant to reproduce certain recitals of the Waqf deed:-

    Section (1): The present Waqf shall be called 'Waqf Fareedi' and this Waqf is created for purposes of residence and sustenance of the persons endowing the Waqf mentioned in Section (4) on the following conditions. In the event of discontinuance of the progeny of the persons endowing the Waqf mentioned in the aforementioned Section, the income of the Waqf property, in accordance with the conditions mentioned in the present document, will be spent, on relatives and orphans and poors' education for those not having means and other beneficial causes, respectively.

    Section 3: (a): It will be incumbent upon every Mutawalli to keep a regular nccounts of the present Waqf and give details of account to cach of the beneficiaries of the Waqf. It will be incumbent upon any Mutawalli that according to the desire of beneficiaries of the Waqf, satisfy them by showing them the accounts of the Waqf.

    (b): If at any time the Mutawalli does not keep accounts, or without any strong and reasonable cause does not pay the income from Wagf property at any appropriate time, to the beneficiaries of the Waqf and necessity of filing of a suit arises, or commits such an omission in the management of the property. or he knowingly commits any act or acts on account of which there is a decrease in the profits of the property or commits express or implied dishonesty or misappropriates then the beneficiaries of the Waqf may jointly or severally will have a right to present a petition before the Authorised Officer get the Mutawalli removed and in his place any other person may be a Mutawalli according to the procedure and intention of the present document to discharge the duties of Mutawalliship.

    Section 4 (a): The income of the Waqf property detailed below shall be spent on the repairs of the dilapidated and fallen buildings and payment of every kind of tax and other expenditures which are necessary for conservation of the Waqf property. The amount left after deduction of necessary disbursement and expenditure above mentioned will remain at the disposal of us executants, generations after generations, womb to womb and the said amount shall be distributed equally between we executants. This equal distribution shall remain operative with the progenies of we executants, that is to say half the income will be given to the progeny of me, the first executant and the other half to me the second exe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top