Indramani Rao vs State of U. P. - 2024 Supreme(All) 1225

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(All) 1225

AJIT KUMAR
Indramani Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ramesh Chandra Dwivedi
For the Respondent: C.S.C. and Kushmondeya Shahi

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Ajit Kumar, J.-Heard Sri R.C. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri K. Shahi, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 5 and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents.

2. Petitioner before this Court is aggrieved by notice dated 13th September, 2022, issued by District Inspector of Schools questioning his B-Ed. degree furnished by him at the time of his initial appointment in the institution in the year 1978 as Assistant Teacher in C.T. grade in junior high school.

3. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the petitioner was initially appointed as Assistant Teacher C.T. grade on 1st July, 1978. Later on, the institution was upgraded as high school in the year 1985 and on 30th March, 1983 by means of a Government Order, the institution was brought on grant-in-aid list. Since, the petitioner's name was there and the institution was brought on grant-in-aid upto junior high school, it was also brought on grant-in-aid list on 8th February, 1996 and the provisions of the U.P. High Schools and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and other Employees) Act, 1971, was made applicable, w.e.f., 1st April, 1996. Petitioner's name figured

Click Here to Read the rest of this document