SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1161

PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Neeru Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sudhanshu Kumar and Swapnil Kumar.

JUDGMENT :

Piyush Agrawal, J.

Heard Mr. Sudhanshu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.C. Mishra, learned ACSC for State-respondents.

2. By means of present petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 28.1.2021 passed by respondent No. 2 in Revision No. 75 of 208 (State of U.P. v. Neeru Agarwal).

3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has purchased a land ad measuring 0.0385 hectare in Khasra No. 421 situated in village Kuvarpur Nagla Baas, Tehsil Hathras, through registered sale-deed dated 28.6.2016 after paying due stamp duty treating the land in question as agricultural land. He further submits that a report dated 28.6.2016 was submitted by the Sub-Registrar treating the land as non-agricultural land on the basis of which, the proceeding under Section 47 A of the Act was initiated against the petitioner and in pursuance thereof notice was issued to the petitioner to which a reply was submitted on each point mentioned in the show-cause notice. Thereafter the A.D.M. by the order dated 17.3.2017 has directed the Tehsildar Hathras to conduct a site inspection and submit a report, who has conducted the site inspection on 26.3.2017 and forwarded

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top