SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2334

SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Samar Raja – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Ashish Kumar Dixit, Anuja Bajpai, Rajiv Kumar Bajpai, Suparna Mishra

JUDGMENT :

SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.

1. Heard Sri Rajiv Kumar Bajpai, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Hemant Kumar Pandey, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 3 and perused the records.

2. By means of the instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged validity of an order dated 22.03.2024 passed by the Assistant Commissioner (Stamp)-First, Lucknow in Case No. 2810 of 2023, under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, whereby a deficiency of Rs. 3,76,950/- in payment of stamp duty has been imposed upon the petitioner besides imposing penalty of Rs. 2,000/- registration fee amounting to Rs. 75,760/- as also fixing the liability to pay interest at the rate of 1.5% per month. The petitioner has also challenged validity of the judgment and order dated 07.08.2024 passed by the Deputy Commissioner (Stamp), Lucknow in Case No. 1836 of 2024, under Section 56(1-A) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, whereby the aforesaid order dated 22.03.2024 has been affirmed.

3. It is recorded in the order dated 22.03.2024 that the aforesaid case was registered on the basis of an inspection report dated 26.11.2022 submitt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top