Kushwaha Mahasabha vs State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 40

RAJESH BINDAL, J. J. MUNIR
Kushwaha Mahasabha – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Gulab Chandra, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. A.K. Goyal, Additional Chief Standing Counsel, Mr. Siddhartha Srivastava, Advocate

ORDER :

1. Present petition was filed by the petitioner claiming it to be in public interest, praying for the following reliefs:-

“i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus commanding to the respondent District Maqgistrate to proceed to take necessary action for removing unauthorized constructions and obstructions raised by the private respondents over the land No. 509, 510, 567, 569, 570, 571 Saidpur Hakins District Bareilly which has been axquired for carrying out Mini Bye Pass Road for public convenience within reasonable time, to meet out the ends of justice.

ii) Issue writ order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus commanding to the respondent authorities to get the public money amount of compensation wrongly received by the respondent Anupama recovered from her with appropriate interest and to initiate penal action against her for playing fraud with the authorities in the interest of justice within stipulated time fixed by this Hon’ble Court.

iii) Issue writ order or direction in the nature of writ of Ad interim mandamus commanding to the respondent District Magistrate to take appropriate action on the complaint dated 05.07.2022 preventing ob